Nowadays, the number of crimes is emerging. In some regions of the US, Some protection laws is regarded that say teens are just allowed to be out till a specific time at night except if they are with an adult. I believe that this curfew is not a good idea to make the youth's life safer.
Firstly, Same special circumstances should be taken into account. There are many teens that have single-parent families. This parents have not enough time to spend with their children outdoors. Same as them, we have ill parents,
Aged parents or in other cases, irresponsible parents are seen. In these instances, I believe it is justified that the curfew did not consider all types of families with their living conditions.
Moreover, Social activists claim some facts that cannot be ignored. They discuss that the government's priority should be raising teenager's ability to face with danger, if they want to bring them to safety. The activists think that it is more practical to teach our youngs how to protect themselves in different situations, and also let them solve some problems once in a while. Furthermore, they assert that there is no proven connection between crime committing percentage and any specific time of the whole day, despite the public attitude.
To conclude, Although the curfew exists in some parts of the Us, I strongly disapprove of imposing it. Taking everything into consideration, it is better to prepare children for their future obstacles instead of limiting them in order to Keeping them safe.
Nowadays, the number of crimes is emerging. In
some
regions of the US,
Some
protection laws
is regarded
that say teens are
just
allowed
to be out till a specific time at night except if they are with an adult. I believe that this curfew is not a
good
idea
to
make
the youth's life safer.
Firstly
, Same special circumstances should
be taken
into account. There are
many
teens that have single-parent families.
This
parents have not
enough
time to spend with their children outdoors. Same as them, we have ill parents,
Aged parents or in other cases, irresponsible parents are
seen
. In these instances, I believe it
is justified
that the curfew did not consider all types of families with their living conditions.
Moreover
, Social activists claim
some
facts that cannot be
ignored
. They discuss that the
government
's priority should be raising
teenager
's ability to face with
danger
, if they want to bring them to safety. The activists
think
that it is more practical to teach our
youngs how
to protect themselves in
different
situations, and
also
let
them solve
some
problems once in a while.
Furthermore
, they assert that there is no proven
connection between
crime committing percentage and any specific time of the whole day, despite the public attitude.
To conclude
, Although the curfew exists in
some
parts of
the Us
, I
strongly
disapprove of imposing it. Taking everything into consideration, it is better to prepare children for their future obstacles
instead
of limiting them in order to
Keeping
them safe.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
0Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
4Mistakes