There are various ways to cut the number of crime. The common way, a traditional one, believe that the crime can be reduced by putting more police on public area and jailed if any offender. Alternative solutions come from modern thinker which site that attacking the poverty and lack of Education ask the source of criminal is the best solution. Who is right they' re a traditionalist or modernist?
People in preference thorough reduction in the number of crime by increasing the police officer often argue that the number of police will not end the problem. Crime in public space is usually as the result of social challenge. Poverty has a big potential to turn people to be a thief because it related to the availability of food which is the basic need of human being and poverty may also as the result of lack of Education. Because there is no chance in education there is no chance to improve wealthiness.
On the other hand, placing more police in the public area is right because the police can directly tackle any crime in there. Moreover the police duty, it' s not only cached and jailed the offender but also to make society abiding the law. In the case of any accident on the street, they can also become the first one who helped the victims. People will feel safer if any police around them.
To sum up, I agree that attacking the poverty and lack of education can have an important role in helping to reduce crime, yet direct watched the society by the police also meaningful too. Crime sometimes is not just about offender intentions but also any opportunity to do so.
There are various ways to
cut
the number of
crime
. The common way, a traditional one, believe that the
crime
can be
reduced
by putting more
police
on public area and jailed if any offender. Alternative solutions
come
from modern thinker which site that attacking the
poverty
and lack of
Education
ask the source of criminal is the best solution. Who is right
they&
#039; re a traditionalist or modernist?
People
in preference thorough reduction in the number of
crime
by increasing the
police
officer
often
argue that the number of
police
will not
end
the problem.
Crime
in public space is
usually
as the result of social challenge.
Poverty
has a
big
potential to turn
people
to be a thief
because
it related to the availability of food which is the basic need of human being and
poverty
may
also
as the result of lack of
Education
.
Because
there is no chance in
education
there is no chance to
improve
wealthiness.
On the other hand
, placing more
police
in the public area is right
because
the
police
can
directly
tackle any
crime
in there.
Moreover
the
police
duty,
it&
#039; s not
only
cached and jailed the offender
but
also
to
make
society abiding the law. In the case of any accident on the street, they can
also
become the
first
one who
helped
the victims.
People
will feel safer if any
police
around them.
To sum up, I
agree
that attacking the
poverty
and lack of
education
can have an
important
role in helping to
reduce
crime
,
yet
direct
watched
the society by the
police
also
meaningful too.
Crime
sometimes is
not
just
about offender intentions
but
also
any opportunity to do
so
.
11Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
23Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
5Mistakes