Currently, in this modern world, education plays vital role in everyone’s life. But there is a major debate in the field of taking part in universities that revolves around the issue of whether educational institutes should accept well-qualified students or scholars of all ages without assessing their current academic levels. This essay will delve into both viewpoints and before reaching an empirical conclusion.
On the one hand, it is admitted that students with decent marks should be trained by reputed universities. To explain scoring high needs determination to work hard and interest in their major. After serious efforts and surviving the competition make students deserve being educated from reputed firms with limited seats, as they can bring more benefits to the country and humanity in the field of research, art and many more. For example, a student with 90% marks in competitive exam is more likely to have admission in a renowned university than an opponent with a 65 % score. Moreover, candidates with ill scores are not reliable for the further performance in study, it may be a loss of resources and time working with such pupils. To enumerate, the biggest reason of low score of such students is distracted mind and can be predicted to keep distracting further and be the loss to the educational institute and society, so more focused and better performer is well suited to this case.
On the other hand, people should be given the freedom to do what they desire and embarking on universities is not an exception. It is absurd to say that education plays no useful role in the adulthood. The country would extremely benefit if its citizens decide to learn in universities despite their ages. However, senior learners must be applied to certain training programs provided appropriately by universities.
To conclude, everyone can freely broaden knowledge by applying to a university in conformity with his or her interest. There is no age to get educated still interest and the will with efforts made to learn do count.
Currently
, in this modern world, education plays vital role in everyone’s life.
But
there is a major debate in the field of taking part in
universities
that revolves around the issue of whether educational institutes should accept well-qualified
students
or scholars of all ages without assessing their
current
academic levels. This essay will delve into both viewpoints and
before
reaching an empirical conclusion.
On the one hand, it
is admitted
that
students
with decent marks should
be trained
by reputed
universities
. To
explain
scoring high needs determination to work
hard
and interest in their major. After serious efforts and surviving the competition
make
students
deserve
being educated
from reputed firms with limited seats, as they can bring more benefits to the country and humanity in the field of research, art and
many
more.
For example
, a
student
with 90% marks in competitive exam is more likely to have admission in a renowned
university
than an opponent with a 65 % score.
Moreover
, candidates with ill scores are not reliable for the
further
performance in study, it may be a loss of resources and time working with such pupils. To enumerate, the biggest reason of low score of such
students
is distracted
mind and can
be predicted
to
keep
distracting
further
and be the loss to the educational institute and society,
so
more focused and better performer is well suited to this case.
On the other hand
,
people
should be
given
the freedom to do what they desire and embarking on
universities
is not an exception. It is absurd to say that education plays no useful role in the adulthood. The country would
extremely
benefit if its citizens decide to learn in
universities
despite their ages.
However
, senior learners
must
be applied
to certain training programs provided
appropriately
by universities.
To conclude
, everyone can
freely
broaden knowledge by applying to a
university
in conformity with
his or her
interest. There is no age to
get
educated
still
interest and the will with efforts made to learn
do
count.