As a result of globalization, skilled workers are welcomed and paid high salary in most of the developed countries. Salary varies depending on job and effort needed. Few suggest that government should control the salary scale and establish a limit for it, while few oppose the view. This essay discusses both views and will draw a conclusion.
People migrate to different counties in search of a lucrative job, and many cooperative business entrepreneurs attract professionals by offering high salaries and through other fringe benefits. For example, many IT employees are relocating to the US from India in search of better financial support. If an employee is paid well, he will work sincerely and happily for the company. Eventually, this will help in the company development and leads to the overall development of the country. In the same way, many people who work abroad send money to their family, this indeed will improve the foreign exchange and economic growth of the parent country as well.
On the contrary, based on the salary tax and other obligations also will increase, this will invite more chaos. For example, based on income all citizens have to pay tax and other due to the government. Moreover, in many countries salary is not paid equally and discriminations in payment may lead to more perplexities. Secondly, the high salaried job requires more involvement from the labors and this may reflect negatively in their family life and health. For instance, an employee who withdraws a hefty amount has to work hard for the company, this change in priority may produce a state of the quandary in family life. So high salaried employees must be limited to maintain a social equilibrium.
Form the above view, it can be stated that the government can keep certain criteria for salary but a full restriction may lead to chaos.
As a result
of globalization, skilled workers
are welcomed
and paid
high
salary
in most of the developed
countries
.
Salary
varies depending on job and effort needed. Few suggest that
government
should control the
salary
scale and establish a limit for it, while few oppose the view. This essay discusses both views and will draw a conclusion.
People
migrate to
different
counties in search of a lucrative job, and
many
cooperative business entrepreneurs attract professionals by offering
high
salaries
and through other fringe benefits.
For example
,
many
IT
employees
are relocating to the US from India in search of better financial support. If an
employee
is paid
well, he will work
sincerely
and
happily
for the
company
.
Eventually
, this will
help
in the
company
development and leads to the
overall
development of the
country
.
In the same way
,
many
people
who work abroad
send
money to their family, this
indeed
will
improve
the foreign exchange and economic growth of the parent
country
as well
.
On the contrary
, based on the
salary
tax and other obligations
also
will increase, this will invite more chaos.
For example
, based on income all citizens
have to
pay tax and other due to the
government
.
Moreover
, in
many
countries
salary
is not paid
equally
and discriminations in payment may lead to more perplexities.
Secondly
, the
high
salaried job requires more involvement from the labors and this may reflect
negatively
in their family life and health.
For instance
, an
employee
who withdraws a hefty amount
has to
work
hard
for the
company
, this
change
in priority may produce a state of the quandary in family life.
So
high
salaried
employees
must
be limited
to maintain a social equilibrium.
Form the above view, it can
be stated
that the
government
can
keep
certain criteria for
salary
but
a full restriction may lead to chaos.