In many countries, imprisonment is the most common solution to crime. However, some people believe that better education will be effective solution. To what extent do you agree or disagree? v.1
In many countries, imprisonment is the most common solution to crime. However, some people believe that better education will be effective solution. v. 1
In the modern world, due to poverty and lack of education, many people are keen to commit a crime. In this regard, although there is an opinion that severe penalty can be a viable option for this issue, others feel that better education is the most effective solution. Personally, I believe that the last option can solve this problem more humanity.
It is widely accepted that if individuals are well-educated, they can run their livelihood. Consequently, they can avoid negative influences of committing crime, such as poverty and lack of education. To illustrate, many poor people are keen to commit a crime. Furthermore, penalizing criminals strictly can demotivate them to come back to normal life. That is to say, offenders can get mental injuries. For example, offenders usually meet other types of criminals in the jail, and they can affect their behaviour and world view.
On the other hand, if criminals are penalized strictly, other people may think about the consequences of offence, and this can prevent them from perpetrates. Moreover, other people can take a lesson from criminals’ experiences. For instance, if people get to know about the life, which offenders live after imprisonment, they will think about their actions in advance. Furthermore, if perpetrators are isolated from society, they will not able to do wrongdoings, and some people believe that such kinds of punishments can save other people’s life. To illustrate, there is an opinion that crime rate will be decreased, if perpetrators get severe penalties, such as capital punishment or life sentences.
To conclude, although many people reckon that severe penalties can help to decrease crime rate, personally, I believe that in order to prevent individuals from criminal life, they should get education.
In the modern world, due to poverty and lack of
education
,
many
people
are keen to commit a
crime
. In this regard, although there is an opinion that severe penalty can be a viable option for this issue, others feel that better
education
is the most effective solution.
Personally
, I believe that the last option can solve this problem more humanity.
It is
widely
accepted
that if individuals are well-educated, they can run their livelihood.
Consequently
, they can avoid
negative
influences of committing
crime
, such as poverty and lack of
education
. To illustrate,
many
poor
people
are keen to commit a
crime
.
Furthermore
, penalizing
criminals
strictly
can demotivate them to
come
back to normal
life
.
That is
to say, offenders can
get
mental injuries.
For example
, offenders
usually
meet
other
types of
criminals
in the jail, and they can affect their
behaviour
and world view.
On the
other
hand, if
criminals
are penalized
strictly
,
other
people
may
think
about the consequences of
offence
, and this can
prevent
them from perpetrates.
Moreover
,
other
people
can take a lesson from
criminals’
experiences.
For instance
, if
people
get
to know about the
life
, which offenders
live
after imprisonment, they will
think
about their actions in advance.
Furthermore
, if perpetrators
are isolated
from society, they will not able to do wrongdoings, and
some
people
believe that such kinds of punishments can save
other
people’s
life
. To illustrate, there is an opinion that
crime
rate will
be decreased
, if perpetrators
get
severe penalties, such as capital punishment or
life
sentences.
To conclude
, although
many
people
reckon that severe penalties can
help
to decrease
crime
rate,
personally
, I believe that in order to
prevent
individuals from
criminal
life
, they should
get
education
.
11Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
32Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
2Mistakes