In many cities around the world, people have little influence in the design and construction of their houses. Many people believe it is better to allow people to freely choose the style and construction of their new homes rather than forcing everyone to follow the uniform style of the local area. In my opinion, a diversity in housing styles can bring many more benefits than drawbacks to an area.
To begin with, cities in Vietnam, such as Saigon, have very few, or even no, regulations on local housing styles, which means that residents in these areas are free to decide on the architecture for their home. The only disadvantage that may arise is the lack of uniformity of houses, which can be a unique feature in certain places. The houses in Hoi An, for instance, demonstrate a consistent style and therefore have made the city a popular tourist destination. If the house owners in this city change the style and break this uniformity, the number of tourists visiting the area is likely to decrease.
However, the advantages brought about by a diversity in housing styles are more worthy of consideration. Firstly, buildings reflecting a variety of architectural designs can make a city more attractive and appealing to people of different cultures. For example, the buildings in the centre of Ho Chi Minh City are designed in both European and Asian styles, which has eventually given the city a more cosmopolitan atmosphere, with residents coming from many different countries. Secondly, the freedom of choice in housing styles can allow local people to be more creative, as they can design their homes in a unique way.
In conclusion, though potentially making some areas less attractive by losing a part of their character, a diversity in architectural styles should be widely encouraged, as it can beautify a city and allow residents to be more creative.
In
many
cities
around the world,
people
have
little
influence in the design and construction of their
houses
.
Many
people
believe it is better to
allow
people
to
freely
choose the
style
and construction of their new homes
rather
than forcing everyone to follow the uniform
style
of the local
area
. In my opinion, a diversity in housing
styles
can bring
many
more benefits than drawbacks to an area.
To
begin
with,
cities
in Vietnam, such as Saigon, have
very
few, or even no, regulations on local housing
styles
, which means that residents in these
areas
are free to decide on the architecture for their home. The
only
disadvantage that may arise is the lack of uniformity of
houses
, which can be a unique feature in certain places. The
houses
in
Hoi
An,
for instance
, demonstrate a consistent
style
and
therefore
have made the city a popular tourist destination. If the
house
owners in this city
change
the
style
and break this uniformity, the number of tourists visiting the
area
is likely to decrease.
However
, the advantages brought about by a diversity in housing
styles
are more worthy of consideration.
Firstly
, buildings reflecting a variety of architectural designs can
make
a city more attractive and appealing to
people
of
different
cultures.
For example
, the buildings in the
centre
of Ho Chi Minh City
are designed
in both European and Asian
styles
, which has
eventually
given
the city a more cosmopolitan atmosphere, with residents coming from
many
different
countries.
Secondly
, the freedom of choice in housing
styles
can
allow
local
people
to be more creative, as they can design their homes
in a unique way
.
In conclusion
, though
potentially
making
some
areas
less attractive by losing a part of their character, a diversity in architectural
styles
should be
widely
encouraged, as it can beautify a city and
allow
residents to be more creative.