There is a continuous rise in crime ratio during the last year. There has been a debate on punishment given to the accused criminals. Some consider the death penalty as the best measure, whereas others believe that other methods should be taken in consideration. We will be discussing both views along with examples in later paragraphs.
First of all, some people believe that penalizing death sentence is the best way to give punishment to the alleged. Such practices would discourage criminals and would result in lowering crime ratio. The countries with strict laws are considered peaceful countries. For example, Canada has the lowest crime ratio across the globe. The reason is their strict legislative policies. They give severe punishments to criminals without any trial. Similarly, Saudia Arabia hangs the culprit who has been guilty of the crime of rape. Therefore, such measures help in lowering the crime stats.
On the other hand, other measures should be considered while sentencing the criminals. The intensity of wrongdoing should be taken in consideration. There are certain cases where the people are falsely involved in the cases. Accusing the innocent people would result in destruction and loss for their families. Moreover, developed countries have their rehabilitation programs to the council the prisoners. For example, In Pakistan the punishment is given to accused according to the severity of the crime. Moreover, America provides counselling sessions to criminals to make them better citizens in future. Therefore, other factors should be given due importance.
To conclude, there has been an intense increase in the crime rates. To address this issue sentencing death penalty is the best tool to lower the misconduct ratio. However, other important tools should be in notice due to the fact that criminals are also human. Mistakes are committed from everyone and counselling should be taken in consideration.
There is a continuous rise in
crime
ratio
during the
last year
. There has been a debate on
punishment
given
to the accused
criminals
.
Some
consider the death penalty as the best measure, whereas others believe that
other
methods should
be taken
in consideration. We will be discussing both views along with examples in later paragraphs.
First of all
,
some
people
believe that penalizing death sentence is the best way to give
punishment
to the alleged. Such practices would discourage
criminals
and would result in lowering
crime
ratio
. The countries with strict laws
are considered
peaceful countries.
For example
, Canada has the lowest
crime
ratio
across the globe. The reason is their strict legislative policies. They give severe
punishments
to
criminals
without any trial.
Similarly
,
Saudia
Arabia hangs the culprit who has been guilty of the
crime
of rape.
Therefore
, such measures
help
in lowering the
crime
stats.
On the
other
hand,
other
measures should
be considered
while sentencing the
criminals
. The intensity of wrongdoing should
be taken
in consideration. There are certain cases where the
people
are
falsely
involved in the cases. Accusing the innocent
people
would result in destruction and loss for their families.
Moreover
,
developed countries
have their rehabilitation programs to the council the prisoners.
For example
, In Pakistan the
punishment
is
given
to accused according to the severity of the
crime
.
Moreover
, America provides counselling sessions to
criminals
to
make
them better citizens
in future
.
Therefore
,
other
factors should be
given
due importance.
To conclude
, there has been an intense increase in the
crime
rates. To address this issue sentencing death penalty is the best tool to lower the misconduct
ratio
.
However
,
other
important
tools should be in notice due to the fact that
criminals
are
also
human. Mistakes
are committed
from everyone and counselling should
be taken
in consideration.