Improvements in ealth, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion? v.1
Improvements in ealth, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas. with the opinion? v. 1
Nowadays, the poverty rate has increased, especially in some countries where there are few people who own almost everything and very poor people that instead have to constantly work to earn just what make them survive. The policy behind what stands out from this incongruency, could also concern other countries, with a wide range of opportunities. I totally agree with the idea that every governments should do its best to help even other countries, if they are in troubles and in this essay I will support my opinion with examples.
Firstly, richer countries should take their responsibilities in helping the in developing ones, since in many cases this poverty can be interpreted as its fault. Let's think in the very past, when the countries that are now considered rich were the ones that tended to submit others, turning them into colonies. These kind of practises had, of course, affected the economy and pauperised the citizens.
Another reason is that we cannot unconcern about the worldwide poverty and governments should take their responsibilities on these issues and offer some aids to improve at least the healthcare and the education for everybody who cannot afford it.
Having said that, surely the responsibilities are not mandatory just for the governments, also in our own we can give some help. There are many companies that are involved in these concerns and promote campaigns to cram for drugs, clothes, books and even money that would be devoted to these people.
To sum up, I strongly believe that governments should really take responsibilities on this issue, prompting some new laws in order to try to get rid of poverty in developing countries. Moreover, we should also acquire awarness that we also could give a help.
Nowadays, the
poverty
rate has increased,
especially
in
some
countries
where there are few
people
who
own
almost everything and
very
poor
people
that
instead
have to
constantly
work to earn
just
what
make
them survive. The policy behind what stands out from this
incongruency
, could
also
concern other
countries
, with a wide range of opportunities. I
totally
agree
with the
idea
that every
governments
should do its best to
help
even other
countries
, if they are in troubles and in this essay I will support my opinion with examples.
Firstly
, richer
countries
should take their
responsibilities
in helping the in developing
ones
, since in
many
cases this
poverty
can
be interpreted
as its fault.
Let
's
think
in the
very
past, when the
countries
that are
now
considered rich were the
ones
that tended to submit others, turning them into colonies.
These kind
of
practises
had,
of course
,
affected
the economy and
pauperised
the citizens.
Another reason is that we cannot unconcern about the worldwide
poverty
and
governments
should take their
responsibilities
on these issues and offer
some
aids to
improve
at least the healthcare and the education for everybody who cannot afford it.
Having said that,
surely
the
responsibilities
are not mandatory
just
for the
governments
,
also
in our
own
we can give
some
help
. There are
many
companies
that
are involved
in these concerns and promote campaigns to cram for drugs, clothes, books and even money that would
be devoted
to these
people
.
To sum up, I
strongly
believe that
governments
should
really
take
responsibilities
on this issue, prompting
some
new laws in order to try to
get
rid of
poverty
in developing
countries
.
Moreover
, we should
also
acquire
awarness
that we
also
could give a
help
.
10Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
20Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
6Mistakes