Children's behaviour always reflects what they learned from their parents and schools. However, most people said that parents have the responsibility of teaching their children to be good in society and others said, it is an obligation of their schools. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument in-depth and provides the opinion of the writer.
Each and every minor's first school is their home and first teachers were their parents. They use to spend more time with their parents and always try to learn things from their mother and father. As per the records proves that, most of the words that a small kid use are the same words that their parents use in family conversations at their house. Clearly, parents have the liability of their youngster acts and most of them mirror their parents themselves.
Even though kids learned things from their parents, teachers from the schools can be corrected. Students start schooling at the age of six and once they entered into the education system, teachers have the ability to influence them to change the way that they already have and already thought of their parents. For example, most of the parents allow the teacher to punish their kids and make them corrected on their bad behaviours. In short, mentors are there to correct the things that students do wrong and that should be accepted by their parents as well.
In conclusion, which party has the greater authority for teaching children good things is questionable and some people argue that it is an obligation of the child's parents and others said it is an authority of the schools. This essay discussed the various reasons why people state that which party has the liability of teaching good behaviours to the children and my opinion is both parties have the responsibility in their own way and they are accountable for their students and kid behaviours.
Children's
behaviour
always reflects what they learned from their
parents
and
schools
.
However
, most
people
said that
parents
have the responsibility of teaching their children to be
good
in society
and others
said, it is an obligation of their
schools
. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument in-depth and provides the opinion of the writer.
Each and every minor's
first
school
is their home and
first
teachers
were their
parents
. They
use to
spend more time with their
parents
and always try to learn things from their mother and father. As per the records proves that, most of the words that a
small
kid
use
are the same words that their
parents
use
in family conversations at their
house
.
Clearly
,
parents
have the liability of their youngster acts and most of them mirror their
parents
themselves.
Even though
kids
learned things from their
parents
,
teachers
from the
schools
can
be corrected
. Students
start
schooling at the age of six and once they entered into the education system,
teachers
have the ability to influence them to
change
the way that they already have and already
thought
of their
parents
.
For example
, most of the
parents
allow
the
teacher
to punish their
kids
and
make
them corrected on their
bad
behaviours
. In short, mentors are there to correct the things that students do
wrong
and that should be
accepted
by their
parents
as well
.
In conclusion
, which party has the greater authority for teaching children
good
things is questionable and
some
people
argue that it is an obligation of the child's
parents
and others
said it is an authority of the
schools
. This essay discussed the various reasons why
people
state that which party has the liability of teaching
good
behaviours
to the children and my opinion is both parties have the responsibility in their
own
way and
they are accountable for their students and
kid
behaviours
.