Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

If a foreign tourist visits your city, where would you take this tourist? A factory, a university, or a museum? v.1

If a foreign tourist visits your city, where would you take this tourist? A factory, a university, or a museum? v. 1
Thanks to the advent of globalization, international corporations have opened their branches in every corner of the world. Consequently, the same products are available everywhere and this has made people and countries look the same. In my opinion, this is not exactly a positive change. I will support my stand with valid arguments in the following paragraphs. First of all, when people everywhere buy the same products, cultural identities disappear. For example, in Shanghai, many foreign clothing companies sell T-shirts to local residents. As a result, few local people wear traditional clothes like qipao now and the traditional clothing industry is dying. Many young people cannot even identify their traditional clothing and fewer people know how to make traditional clothes. If the government took actions to help the traditional clothing industry, people would be able to keep their cultural heritage and craftsmen working in this sector would not lose their livelihood. Unfortunately, that is not the case and locals are forgetting their culture and ethnicity. On top of this, buying the same stuff everywhere is bad for local economies and the environment. Oftentimes, products are imported from foreign countries and have to travel thousands of miles before they reach the end user. This does not help the environment or the local craftsmen. The only beneficiaries are multinational companies. Small businesses and manufactures cannot compete with them and quickly lose their market share and there is less demand for skilled workers who can produce goods with local features. Consequently, people employed in traditional sectors are becoming jobless. For instance, the young generation prefers fast food rather than traditional Chinese food. The market is shrunk for these people who make a living by selling traditional Chinese foods. Likewise, carpenters, cobblers, potters are all becoming jobless in the current scenario. To sum up, the disadvantages overweigh the benefits when people begin to buy the same goods everywhere and different regions become more and more similar. In this scenario, the cultural heritage will be destroyed and the unemployment rate will rise.
Thanks to the advent of globalization, international corporations have opened their branches in every corner of the world.
Consequently
, the same products are available
everywhere
and this has made
people
and countries look the same. In my opinion, this is not exactly a
positive
change
. I will support my stand with valid arguments in the following paragraphs.

First of all
, when
people
everywhere
buy
the same products, cultural identities disappear.
For example
, in Shanghai,
many
foreign clothing
companies
sell T-shirts to
local
residents.
As a result
, few
local
people
wear
traditional
clothes like
qipao
now
and the
traditional
clothing industry is dying.
Many
young
people
cannot even identify their
traditional
clothing and fewer
people
know how to
make
traditional
clothes. If the
government
took actions to
help
the
traditional
clothing industry,
people
would be able to
keep
their cultural heritage and craftsmen working in this sector would not lose their livelihood. Unfortunately,
that is
not the case and
locals
are forgetting their culture and ethnicity.

On top of this, buying the same stuff
everywhere
is
bad
for
local
economies and the environment. Oftentimes, products
are imported
from foreign countries and
have to
travel thousands of miles
before
they reach the
end
user. This does not
help
the environment or the
local
craftsmen. The
only
beneficiaries are multinational
companies
.
Small
businesses and manufactures cannot compete with them and
quickly
lose their market share and there is less demand for skilled workers who can produce
goods
with
local
features.
Consequently
,
people
employed in
traditional
sectors are becoming jobless.
For instance
, the young generation prefers
fast
food
rather
than
traditional
Chinese food. The market
is shrunk
for these
people
who
make
a living by selling
traditional
Chinese foods.
Likewise
, carpenters, cobblers, potters are all becoming jobless in the
current
scenario.

To sum up, the disadvantages
overweigh
the benefits when
people
begin
to
buy
the same
goods
everywhere
and
different
regions become more and more similar. In this scenario, the cultural heritage will be
destroyed
and the unemployment rate will rise.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes

IELTS essay If a foreign tourist visits your city, where would you take this tourist? A factory, a university, or a museum? v. 1

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
337 words
7
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 7.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 7.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts