Over the years, there has been a tremendous increase in the rate at which criminal activities are being infiltrated. Although it is believed by some people that the ultimate penalty for such offences should be death, others think that the government should inculcate other means of punishment. In my opinion, I agree with the former assertion as this would help put criminals in check.
On the one hand, it is believed that a death penalty should be awarded to all offenders because it will reduce criminal activities and I agree. This is because it will limit the number of such crimes being committed. Also, punishments like this will serve as a warning to other intending perpetrators to desist from such practices. To illustrate, ever since the Iraqi government slated the death penalty for all crimes, the crime rate dropped from fifty percent to fifteen per cent within a space of two years. This reemphasizes the need for such laws in order to maintain peace in the land.
On the other hand, the government should have a fairer system such as the rehabilitation of criminals as not all criminals deserve to be killed. Community services, rehabilitating criminals are few methods that the state can uphold in order to punish them. This not only helps foster a more balanced judiciary system, but also goes a long way in reforming the offenders and getting back on their feet. A good example of such measures is the introduction of community services for milder offences by the Lagos State government. Not only did this help keep the state sane, but it also helped in rebuilding the lives of such criminals.
To conclude, while it is advised by some to give a more lenient punishment for certain crimes, it is highly essential to award a death penalty as this will help reduce the crime rate. I, therefore, believe that the reward for all crimes should be death, as this will help breed a safer community devoid of crime and offenders.
Over the years, there has been a tremendous increase in the rate at which
criminal
activities are
being infiltrated
. Although it
is believed
by
some
people
that the ultimate
penalty
for such
offences
should be death, others
think
that the
government
should inculcate
other
means of punishment. In my opinion, I
agree
with the former assertion as this would
help
put
criminals
in
check
.
On the one hand, it
is believed
that a death
penalty
should
be awarded
to all offenders
because
it will
reduce
criminal
activities and I
agree
. This is
because
it will limit the number of such
crimes
being committed
.
Also
, punishments like this will serve as a warning to
other
intending perpetrators to desist from such practices. To illustrate, ever since the Iraqi
government
slated the death
penalty
for all
crimes
, the
crime
rate dropped from fifty percent to fifteen per cent within a space of two years. This reemphasizes the need for such laws in order to maintain peace in the land.
On the
other
hand, the
government
should have a fairer system such as the rehabilitation of
criminals
as not all
criminals
deserve to
be killed
. Community services, rehabilitating
criminals
are few methods that the state can uphold in order to punish them. This not
only
helps
foster a more balanced judiciary system,
but
also
goes a long way in reforming the offenders and getting back on their feet. A
good
example of such measures is the introduction of community services for milder
offences
by the Lagos State
government
. Not
only
did this
help
keep
the state sane,
but
it
also
helped
in rebuilding the
lives
of such criminals.
To conclude
, while it
is advised
by
some
to give a more lenient punishment for certain
crimes
, it is
highly
essential to award a death
penalty
as this will
help
reduce
the
crime
rate. I,
therefore
, believe that the reward for all
crimes
should be death, as this will
help
breed a safer community devoid of
crime
and offenders.
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes