The governments' expenditure in different areas, particularly art and sport has always been criticized by people. Some argue that the budget should be allocated to promoting these subjects at schools, while others are in favor of funding them in a way that these activities become more accessible by the public. I am inclined to spend the money in moderation, because otherwise the future of arts and sport is likely to be jeopardized.
It is vital for governments to sponsor athletes and artists to preserve the popularity of art and sports among people. To illustrate, performing art, which can be in terms of concerts, dramas or cinema films, requires a considerable amount of money. If government does not invest in artists, they ought to raise funds for their activities by increasing the prices of the tickets. As a result of becoming unaffordable, fewer people will be eager to watch performances. The case is more or less similar for the professional sports. The earning capacity of the athletes mainly depends on the rewards; therefore, they must attend competitions to rival their peers to win awards. Such attendances require financial resources to cover the costs, otherwise they will be deprived of joining national, let alone international competitions.
Once there is no audience for the art performances, and no financial resources for joining sport competitions, the artists and sport players are urged to abandon their profession. These repercussions are likely to eliminate the need for investments in educating students. In other words, these two areas are tightly related to each other. In addition, as the individuals' passion for art and sport forms during the early ages of their life, the schools play a crucial role in cultivating these skills, which demonstrates the importance of governmental expenditure on the extracurricular activities at schools.
To conclude, allocating a larger portion of budget to either schools or the public is likely to have adverse effects on the popularity of arts and sports. That is to say, governments should reach a balance to be capable of developing these activities in society.
The
governments
' expenditure in
different
areas,
particularly
art
and
sport
has always
been criticized
by
people
.
Some
argue that the budget should
be allocated
to promoting these subjects at schools, while others are in favor of funding them in a way that these
activities
become more accessible by the public. I
am inclined
to spend the money in moderation,
because
otherwise
the future of
arts
and
sport
is likely to
be jeopardized
.
It is vital for
governments
to sponsor athletes and artists to preserve the popularity of
art
and
sports
among
people
. To illustrate, performing
art
, which can be in terms of concerts, dramas or cinema films, requires a considerable amount of money. If
government
does not invest in artists, they ought to raise funds for their
activities
by increasing the prices of the tickets.
As a result
of becoming unaffordable, fewer
people
will be eager to
watch
performances. The case is more or less similar for the professional
sports
. The earning capacity of the athletes
mainly
depends on the rewards;
therefore
, they
must
attend competitions to rival their peers to win awards. Such attendances require financial resources to cover the costs,
otherwise
they will
be deprived
of joining national,
let
alone international competitions.
Once there is no audience for the
art
performances, and no financial resources for joining
sport
competitions, the artists and
sport
players
are urged
to abandon their profession. These repercussions are likely to eliminate the need for investments in educating students.
In other words
, these two areas are
tightly
related to each other.
In addition
, as the individuals' passion for
art
and
sport
forms during the early ages of their life, the schools play a crucial role in cultivating these
skills
, which demonstrates the importance of governmental expenditure on the extracurricular
activities
at schools.
To conclude
, allocating a larger portion of budget to either schools or the public is likely to have adverse effects on the popularity of
arts
and
sports
.
That is
to say,
governments
should reach a balance to be capable of developing these
activities
in society.