Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Governments should make more effort to promote alternative sources of energy. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? v.3

Governments should make more effort to promote alternative sources of energy. with this opinion? v. 3
In recent years, awareness regarding non-conventional energy sources has increased. Some believe that the governments should encourage greater usage of alternative sources of energy over traditional ones. I strongly agree with the premise and will be sharing my views on the same. Firstly, non-conventional sources of energy are environment friendly. This is due to the fact that energy sources, such as renewables don't cause pollution. For example, solar energy can be harvested by installing solar panels and there is no pollution generated by solar panels. If instead of solar energy, we use traditional forms of energy, then the pollution generated by the plants is exponentially high, which damages the environment. For example, crude oil harvesting plants mostly generate large amount of polluting gas as a byproduct of the energy generation process. Secondly, conventional sources of energy are limited in nature. Since all traditional energy sources have been created due to change in the chemical nature of earth, hence, they are limited in nature and can be exhausted. For example, as per current average usage of coal from the United States, all coal mines in the United Stats are expected to be depleted by the end of the 21st century. Instead, alternative sources of energy are unlimited in nature and can be used without being worried about their availability in the future. For example, wind energy is generated due to movement of wind on the surface of earth and the energy in unlimited in nature. To conclude, governments should definitely increase effort for promotion of alternative energy sources since not only are they non-damaging to the environment, but they are also unlimited in nature.
In recent years, awareness regarding non-conventional
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
has increased.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
believe that the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
should encourage greater usage of alternative
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
over traditional ones. I
strongly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with the premise and will be sharing my views on the same.

Firstly
, non-conventional
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
are environment friendly.
This is due to the fact that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
, such as renewables don't cause pollution. For
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
example
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
solar
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
can
be harvested
by installing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
solar
panels and there is no pollution generated by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
solar
panels. If
instead
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
solar
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
, we
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
traditional forms of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
, then the pollution generated by the plants is
exponentially
high, which damages the environment. For
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
example
, crude oil harvesting plants
mostly
generate large amount of polluting gas as a byproduct of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
generation process.

Secondly
, conventional
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
are limited
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nature
. Since all traditional
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
have
been created
due to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
in the chemical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nature
of earth,
hence
, they
are limited
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nature
and can
be exhausted
. For
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
example
, as per
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
current
average usage of coal from the United States, all coal mines in the United Stats are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
expected
to
be depleted
by the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
of the 21st century.
Instead
, alternative
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
are unlimited
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nature
and can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
without
being worried
about their availability in the future. For
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
example
, wind
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
is generated
due to movement of wind on the surface of earth and the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
in unlimited in nature.

To conclude
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
should definitely increase effort for promotion of alternative
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
since not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
are they non-damaging to the environment,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
they are
also
unlimited in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nature
.
14Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
35Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Mistakes

IELTS essay Governments should make more effort to promote alternative sources of energy. with this opinion? v. 3

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
273 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts