Some would argue that artists should not be supported by the state because supporting them is just a waste of financial resources and the government should invest it into more useful things. While some say that artists do everything for themselves not for the country, I believe that they are the brand ambassador of the country.
On the one hand, artists perform to earn the fame and money for themselves, they do not care about the country. Thus, the government should spend that money into the things that can bring more benefits in the future rather spending it on artists. Such as, reforms in education system may bring revolutionary change in the future of the country. For example, a recent research revealed that 80% of the developing countries can secure their future just by investing more money in their education sector. However, I do not agree with this view because it is not the proper way to secure the countries future.
On the other hand, artists are the brand ambassador of the country. They represent the soft image of the country to the world. And people know their country just by knowing them. For instance, Atif Aslam is a leading singer in Pakistan and people know him all over the world and because of knowing him, they got to know that there is a country exist named Pakistan.
I believe that the state should encourage artists, because they have the power that can attract people from all over the globe towards the country.
In conclusion, although many say that artist ought not be encouraged by the state, I would say because they represent the country’s positive image to the world, thus, they must be appreciated by the government.
Some
would argue that
artists
should not
be supported
by the state
because
supporting them is
just
a waste of financial resources and the
government
should invest it into more useful things. While
some
say that
artists
do everything for themselves not for the
country
, I believe that they are the brand ambassador of the country.
On the one hand,
artists
perform to earn the fame and money for themselves, they do not care about the
country
.
Thus
, the
government
should spend that money into the things that can bring more benefits in the future
rather
spending it on
artists
. Such as, reforms in education system may bring revolutionary
change
in the future of the
country
.
For example
, a recent research revealed that 80% of the developing
countries
can secure their future
just
by investing more money in their education sector.
However
, I do not
agree
with this view
because
it is not the proper way to secure the
countries
future.
On the other hand
,
artists
are the brand ambassador of the
country
. They represent the soft image of the
country
to the world. And
people
know their
country
just
by knowing them.
For instance
,
Atif
Aslam
is a leading singer in Pakistan and
people
know him all over the world and
because
of knowing him, they
got
to know that there is a
country
exist named Pakistan.
I believe that the state should encourage
artists
,
because
they have the power that can attract
people
from all over the globe towards the country.
In conclusion
, although
many
say that
artist
ought not
be encouraged
by the state, I would say
because
they represent the
country’s
positive
image to the world,
thus
, they
must
be appreciated
by the
government
.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
17Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
2Mistakes