Government should apply tax on unhealthy food to inspire people to eat healthy food which is beneficial for their health. Do you agree or disagree v.1
Government should apply tax on unhealthy food to inspire people to eat healthy food which is beneficial for their health. v. 1
In many countries, national authorities impose a tax on harmful food. While the tax on detrimental food may minimize its use, it is also likely that people will get motivated towards beneficial food. However, I firmly believe that food not good for health must have high taxes on them to encourage people for healthy food consumption.
To initiate with, in order to decrease the use of harmful food, there should be a higher amount of taxes on them, because it will become expensive and difficult to purchase for many people. As a result, it will reduce the use of dangerous food. Australia, as an example, has applied heavy taxes on unhealthy food responsible for human illness. Hence, Increasing the amount of tax on dangerous food items will restrict its usage.
Moreover, people purchase more tax-free food as compared to food with tax, because they do not want to pay their valuable money to the government in terms of tax on food items, as they are already paying enough to the government in the form of utility bills. Consequently, they buy items with zero tax on them. In my country, for instance, people had purchased most of the food items which were free of tax last year. So, tax-free food items have more worth than food items with tax.
To sum up, governments of different countries had already added tax to food not good for health a few years ago. The use of harmful food can be reduced by applying tax on them and will also motivate people to buy tax-free healthy food. I utterly concur that people will get encouraged to use healthy food over unhealthy food if unhealthy food would have tax on them.
In
many
countries, national authorities impose a
tax
on harmful
food
. While the
tax
on detrimental
food
may minimize its
use
, it is
also
likely that
people
will
get
motivated towards beneficial
food
.
However
, I
firmly
believe that
food
not
good
for health
must
have high
taxes
on them to encourage
people
for healthy
food
consumption.
To initiate with, in order to decrease the
use
of harmful
food
, there should be a higher amount of
taxes
on them,
because
it will become expensive and difficult to
purchase
for
many
people
.
As a result
, it will
reduce
the
use
of
dangerous
food
. Australia, as an example, has applied heavy
taxes
on unhealthy
food
responsible for human illness.
Hence
, Increasing the amount of
tax
on
dangerous
food
items
will restrict its usage.
Moreover
,
people
purchase
more tax-free
food
as compared to
food
with
tax
,
because
they do not want to pay their valuable money to the
government
in terms of
tax
on
food
items
, as they are already paying
enough
to the
government
in the form of utility bills.
Consequently
, they
buy
items
with zero
tax
on them. In my country,
for instance
,
people
had
purchased
most of the
food
items
which were free of
tax
last year.
So
, tax-free
food
items
have more worth than
food
items
with tax.
To sum up,
governments
of
different
countries had already
added
tax
to
food
not
good
for health a few years ago. The
use
of harmful
food
can be
reduced
by applying
tax
on them and will
also
motivate
people
to
buy
tax-free healthy
food
. I
utterly
concur that
people
will
get
encouraged to
use
healthy
food
over unhealthy
food
if unhealthy
food
would have
tax
on them.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
47Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Mistakes