The art, music and theatre constitute an integral part of the culture of any country. The government often found supporting these by arranging a requisite amount of funds but for some spending on these activities should ideally be utilised for the welfare of the country’s people as it otherwise does not serve any good purpose. I think there is nothing wrong in supporting arts of a country and government is the ideal body who should do this.
With globalisation, often the culture of developing countries transforms to adopt the traits of developed countries. For example traditional street plays in India are things of past and people are more inclined toward watching movies, a culture from the western countries. This poses a threat to the existence of an intrinsic regional culture of a country which actually defines the spirit and uniqueness of the country. So it is the responsibility of the government to support traditional art, music and theatre which tends to carry the cultural heritage of a country.
Every year a lot is spent by the government to promote regional art, music and theatre and this is something which people suggest is a waste of money. Prima facie it is correct, but on the other hand, it helps promote these features of a country which help the government to attract more and more tourists from other country and it also acts as the livelihood of the people who are solely dependent on these skills. For instance, nation foreign exchange has risen 20%, since the last five years, thanks to the increasing promotion by the government.
To summarise, it may involve a huge cost for a nation to support art, music and theatre but it should be seen as an investment for supporting the unique heritage of the country.
The
art
,
music
and
theatre
constitute an integral part of the
culture
of any
country
. The
government
often
found supporting these by arranging a requisite amount of funds
but
for
some
spending on these activities should
ideally
be
utilised
for the welfare of the
country’s
people
as it
otherwise
does not serve any
good
purpose. I
think
there is nothing
wrong
in supporting
arts
of a
country
and
government
is the ideal body who should do this.
With
globalisation
,
often
the
culture
of developing
countries
transforms to adopt the traits of developed
countries
.
For example
traditional street plays in India are things of past and
people
are more inclined toward watching movies, a
culture
from the western
countries
. This poses a threat to the existence of an intrinsic regional
culture
of a
country
which actually defines the spirit and uniqueness of the
country
.
So
it is the responsibility of the
government
to support traditional
art
,
music
and
theatre
which tends to carry the cultural heritage of a country.
Every year a lot
is spent
by the
government
to promote regional
art
,
music
and
theatre
and this is something which
people
suggest is a waste of money.
Prima
facie
it is correct,
but
on the other hand
, it
helps
promote these features of a
country
which
help
the
government
to attract more and more tourists from other
country
and it
also
acts as the livelihood of the
people
who are
solely
dependent on these
skills
.
For instance
, nation foreign exchange has risen 20%, since the last five years, thanks to the increasing promotion by the
government
.
To
summarise
, it may involve a huge cost for a nation to support
art
,
music
and
theatre
but
it should be
seen
as an investment for supporting the unique heritage of the
country
.
5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
37Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
9Mistakes