Fossil fuels are the main source of energy in many countries. However, in some countries, alternative sources of energy are encouraged. Do you think this is positive or negative development? v.1
Fossil fuels are the main source of energy in many countries. However, in some countries, alternative sources of energy are encouraged. Do you think this is positive or negative development? v. 1
These days, fossil fuels are known as significant resources of energy; however, alternative sources such as wind and solar energy are utilized in most developed countries like the USA, Japan. As far as I am concerned, this tendency brings about more positive effects than negative ones.
On the negative side, solar and wind energy depend on whether. In windless countries obtaining this type of energy is implausible; therefore, it is common for certain countries. Moreover, most new energy sources are costlier than conventional ones. For instance, majority of poor countries use fossil fuels for their cost, although they are aware of damage of them.
In spite of the evident drawbacks, I still believe that usage of alternative sources has more benefits for governments and people. The major advantage of it is that wind and solar have less harm than fossils. That is to say, if the countries use these sources, their people will be healthy. For instance, oil and coal energy release a large amount of toxic which cannot be emitted by the alternatives. Furthermore, production of wind an solar energy is considerably easier than traditional sources like oil and natural gas. There are lots of steps in producing fossils, but gaining alternatives is much more uncomplicated.
By way of conclusion, I believe that the merits of utilizing alternative sources of energy are of more significance when it is compared to demerits. From my personal perspective, this trend should be prevail the whole world.
These days,
fossil
fuels
are known
as significant resources of
energy
;
however
,
alternative
sources
such as
wind
and
solar
energy
are utilized
in most developed
countries
like the USA, Japan. As far as I
am concerned
, this tendency brings about more
positive
effects than
negative
ones.
On the
negative
side,
solar
and
wind
energy
depend on whether. In windless
countries
obtaining this type of
energy
is implausible;
therefore
, it is common for certain
countries
.
Moreover
, most new
energy
sources
are costlier than conventional ones.
For instance
,
majority of
poor
countries
use
fossil
fuels for their cost, although they are aware of
damage of
them.
In spite of
the evident drawbacks, I
still
believe that usage of
alternative
sources
has more benefits for
governments
and
people
. The major advantage of it is that
wind
and
solar
have less harm than
fossils
.
That is
to say, if the
countries
use
these
sources
, their
people
will be healthy.
For instance
, oil and coal
energy
release a large amount of toxic which cannot
be emitted
by the
alternatives
.
Furthermore
, production of
wind
an
solar
energy
is
considerably
easier than traditional
sources
like oil and natural gas. There are lots of steps in producing
fossils
,
but
gaining
alternatives
is much more uncomplicated.
By way of conclusion, I believe that the merits of utilizing
alternative
sources
of
energy
are of more significance when it
is compared
to demerits. From my personal perspective, this trend should be
prevail
the whole world.
9Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
36Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
4Mistakes