Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? v.5

Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. with this opinion? v. 5
It is sometimes argued that tourists from overseas should be charged more than local residents to visit important sites and monuments. I completely disagree with this idea. The argument in favour of higher prices for foreign tourists would be that cultural or historical attractions often depend on state subsidies to keep them going, which means that the resident population already pays money to these sites through the tax system. However, I believe this to be a very shortsighted view. Foreign tourists contribute to the economy of the host country with the money they spend on a wide range of goods and services, including food, souvenirs, accommodation and travel. The governments and inhabitants of every country should be happy to subsidise important tourist sites and encourage people from the rest of the world to visit them. If travellers realised that they would have to pay more to visit historical and cultural attractions in a particular nation, they would perhaps decide not to go to that country on holiday. To take the UK as an example, the tourism industry and many related jobs rely on visitors coming to the country to see places like Windsor Castle or Saint Paul’s Cathedral. These two sites charge the same price regardless of nationality, and this helps to promote the nation’s cultural heritage. If overseas tourists stopped coming due to higher prices, there would be a risk of insufficient funding for the maintenance of these important buildings. In conclusion, I believe that every effort should be made to attract tourists from overseas, and it would be counterproductive to make them pay more than local residents.
It is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
sometimes
argued that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tourists
from overseas should
be charged
more than local residents to visit
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sites
and monuments. I completely disagree with this
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
.

The argument in
Possible spelling mistake. 'favour' is British English.
favour
of higher prices for foreign
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tourists
would be that cultural or historical attractions
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
depend on state subsidies to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
keep
them going, which means that the resident population already pays money to these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sites
through the tax system.
However
, I believe this to be a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
shortsighted view. Foreign
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tourists
contribute to the economy of the host
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
with the money they spend on a wide range of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
goods
and services, including food, souvenirs, accommodation and travel. The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
and inhabitants of every
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
should be happy to
Possible spelling mistake. 'subsidise' is British English.
subsidise
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tourist
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sites
and encourage
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
from the rest of the world to visit them.

If
Possible spelling mistake found.
travellers
Possible spelling mistake. 'realised' is British English.
realised
that they would
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
pay more to visit historical and cultural attractions in a particular nation, they would perhaps decide not to go to that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
on holiday. To take the UK as an example, the tourism industry and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
related jobs rely on visitors coming to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
see
places like Windsor Castle or Saint Paul’s Cathedral. These two
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sites
charge the same price regardless of nationality, and this
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
helps
to promote the nation’s cultural heritage. If overseas
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tourists
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
stopped
coming due to higher prices, there would be a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
risk
of insufficient funding for the maintenance of these
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
buildings.

In conclusion
, I believe that every effort should
be made
to attract
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tourists
from overseas, and it would be counterproductive to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
them pay more than local residents.
2Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
14Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
4Mistakes

IELTS essay Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. with this opinion? v. 5

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
269 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts