We are running out of fuel owing to its increased consumption, according to some people one solution may be to raise the prices of petrol. I disagree to this pinion as it may affect people from low socioeconomic group.
The escalation in the price of gasoline in order to reduce its consumption is not a good notion as it will primarily influence people with low income. As the price hike will be same for rich and poor, it will have a detrimental effect on the budget of low socioeconomic group. They may have to reduce the expenses on more important expenditures like education and health of children. As the prices of petrol is closely linked to other domestic consumer items like edible oils and food items, eventually it will result in a generalized price hike which is not feasible. Therefore, saving for petrol at the cost of health and education is not a useful bargain.
The increased rates of fuel cannot be considered an isolated rise. This fuel is used in factories and industries for the production of garments, sugar, salt and other basic amenities of life so their prices will also rise. This may result in generalized inflation and then government has to pay subsidization for the general public. For example, in the Iraq war, destruction of petrol reservoirs resulted in a sudden hike in price for petrol per barrel which almost affected the global economy. Hence, the increase in the value of petrol will practically make everything expensive.
In conclusion, the increase in petrol price to reduce its consumption is not a good option, governments should rather lay stress on the use of hybrid and other fuel efficient cars in order to conserve what we already have.
We are running out of
fuel
owing to its increased consumption, according to
some
people
one solution may be to raise the
prices
of
petrol
. I disagree to this pinion as it may affect
people
from low socioeconomic group.
The escalation in the
price
of gasoline in order to
reduce
its consumption is not a
good
notion as it will
primarily
influence
people
with low income. As the
price
hike will be same for rich and poor, it will have a detrimental effect on the budget of low socioeconomic group. They may
have to
reduce
the expenses on more
important
expenditures like education and health of children. As the
prices
of
petrol
is
closely
linked to other domestic consumer items like edible oils and food items,
eventually
it will result in a generalized
price
hike which is not feasible.
Therefore
, saving for
petrol
at the cost of health and education is not a useful bargain.
The increased rates of
fuel
cannot
be considered
an isolated rise. This
fuel
is
used
in factories and industries for the production of garments, sugar, salt and other basic amenities of life
so
their
prices
will
also
rise. This may result in generalized inflation and then
government
has to
pay subsidization for the
general public
.
For example
, in the Iraq war, destruction of
petrol
reservoirs resulted in a sudden hike in
price
for
petrol
per barrel which almost
affected
the global economy.
Hence
, the increase in the value of
petrol
will
practically
make
everything expensive.
In conclusion
, the increase in
petrol
price
to
reduce
its consumption is not a
good
option,
governments
should
rather
lay
stress
on the
use
of hybrid and other
fuel
efficient cars in order to conserve what we already have.
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes