Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, the Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public. Do you agree or disagree? v.1
Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, the Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public. v. 1
Countries with less economy should be supported by the richer countries when they hit by any natural disasters like Tsunami, Earthquake etc. I completely agree, the states with good economy should help the poorer countries not only when there is a natural tragedy, but also when they face some human-made disasters.
Initially, If the country faced some natural disaster, it will affect the country's economy when compared to the global GDP. The poor economic countries will have tremendous problems due to the local body can't help the people who are in need as there are lack of funds. The wealthy countries should help the needy countries to support their people and to come out from natural disaster. For example, when Srilanka and the western part of Asia were hit by the dangerous Tsunami which has caused huge loss to life and property in this case many wealthy states took the step to come forward and help them economically.
Additionally, the wealthy nations should also help the territory's when there are some man-made disasters like the Coronavirus, which is spreading widely as there are some poor economic states like Africa, even they don't have good equipment to test the virus so the wealthy territories should also help the less economic states in this case. As the wealthier country can help the poorer countries when they suffer any natural tragedy by exporting food and giving the money to recur their current damage to the state.
In conclusion, I agree with the above statement that the well off kingdom's should help the less economic countries when they face any environment attack. However, this helps the local governance to rebuild their damage and also helping the people who are in need.
Countries
with less economy should
be supported
by the richer
countries
when they hit by any
natural
disasters
like Tsunami, Earthquake etc. I completely
agree
, the
states
with
good
economy should
help
the poorer
countries
not
only
when there is a
natural
tragedy,
but
also
when they face
some
human-made disasters.
Initially
, If the
country
faced
some
natural
disaster
, it will affect the country's economy when compared to the global GDP. The poor
economic
countries
will have tremendous problems due to the local body can't
help
the
people
who are in need as there are lack of funds. The
wealthy
countries
should
help
the needy
countries
to support their
people
and to
come
out from
natural
disaster
.
For example
, when
Srilanka
and the western part of Asia
were hit
by the
dangerous
Tsunami which has caused huge loss to life and property
in this case
many
wealthy
states
took the step to
come
forward and
help
them
economically
.
Additionally
, the
wealthy
nations should
also
help
the
territory's
when there are
some
man
-made
disasters
like the Coronavirus, which is spreading
widely
as there are
some
poor
economic
states
like Africa, even they don't have
good
equipment to
test
the virus
so
the
wealthy
territories should
also
help
the less
economic
states
in this case
. As the wealthier
country
can
help
the poorer
countries
when they suffer any
natural
tragedy by exporting food and giving the money to recur their
current
damage to the state.
In conclusion
, I
agree
with the above statement that the well off kingdom's should
help
the less
economic
countries
when they face any environment attack.
However
, this
helps
the local governance to rebuild their damage and
also
helping the
people
who are in need.
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes