Many parents think that it is better to encourage children to have a habit of fighting, but in contrast, some concern that teaching children how to work in groups might be better because this might make children become more useful in the future. In spite of the dilemma, these also have some advantages and disadvantages.
To begin with the opinion that children should be taught to compete with the others, for example, their classmate. In fact, competition is usually regarded as an act keeping people pushing harder in order to reach to the success. In addition, some weak points might be revealed during the term that children afford to fight each other. In a battle, for instance, if they do not address these weaknesses, their enemies will use these to strike back. By the way, this stereotype might contain some drawbacks such as this could make children feel lonely and be isolated. Thus, it is better for children to learn to compete themselves.
On the other hand, teaching children how to work in group is the other side of the coin. We are living in the age of globalisation, which means we will not achieve everything if we are alone. In other words, children may have less opportunities in career than the others because of the sense of race. Learning is not only the one-way progress of teachers and students, it is a progress of making connection between people, it is a kind of social activity as well. Moreover, children may learn new things from their friends as well. Vietnamese ancient people used to state that we cannot break a group of chopsticks but every single one of those.
To sum up, this opinion of having a sense of fighting might encourage children to be successful, but this also make them feel isolated. In contrast, learning to co-operate will help children be more confident. In my opinion, we could reduce the risks by educating children work together and equipping them a sense of self-competition.
Many
parents
think
that it is better to encourage
children
to have a habit of fighting,
but
in contrast
,
some
concern that teaching
children
how to work in groups
might
be better
because
this
might
make
children
become more useful in the future.
In spite of
the dilemma, these
also
have
some
advantages and disadvantages.
To
begin
with the opinion that
children
should
be taught
to compete with the others,
for example
, their classmate. In fact, competition is
usually
regarded as an act keeping
people
pushing harder in order to reach to the success.
In addition
,
some
weak points
might
be revealed
during the term that
children
afford to fight each
other
.
In
a battle,
for instance
, if they do not address these weaknesses, their enemies will
use
these to strike back. By the way, this stereotype
might
contain
some
drawbacks such as this could
make
children
feel lonely and
be isolated
.
Thus
, it is better for
children
to learn to compete themselves.
On the
other
hand, teaching
children
how to work in group is the
other
side of the coin. We are living in the age of
globalisation
, which means we will not achieve everything if we are alone. In
other
words,
children
may have
less
opportunities in career than the others
because
of the sense of race. Learning is not
only
the one-way progress of teachers and students, it is
a progress
of making
connection between
people
, it is a kind of social activity
as well
.
Moreover
,
children
may learn new things from their friends
as well
. Vietnamese ancient
people
used
to state that we cannot break a group of chopsticks
but
every single one of those.
To sum up, this opinion of having a sense of fighting
might
encourage
children
to be successful,
but
this
also
make
them feel isolated.
In contrast
, learning to co-operate will
help
children
be more confident. In my opinion, we could
reduce
the
risks
by educating
children
work together and equipping them a sense of self-competition.