At the present time, congestion is becoming popular in several cities because of overwhelming vehicles that leads the city is not ideal precinct to live. Thereby, some governments consider to prohibit individual cars in urban areas. I am convinced that this law should be done because some reasons which are the polluted exhaust, traffic system as well as gaining benefits to citizens.
The most significant reason is pollution from car fumes, which is in danger to human’s health causing respiratory diseases such as asthma and bronchitis. Furthermore, smoke from car results in the warmer climate and destroying the ozone layer.
A second reason why I am in favor of cars being banned is that many cities were not designed for motor traffic. A good example of this is Ho Chi Minh, the central city in the south of Viet Nam, which has narrow streets and lack of parking lot. Hence, traffic jam usually occur at the rush hour and parking a car extremely difficult in this area.
Finally, people can save greatly money by taking advantage of public transports instead of private cars. In addition, people may be safer when they must not drive in some dangerous cases such as drinking alcohol and having phone calls.
On the other hand, the prohibition of private cars might be impossible in several underdeveloped countries that do not have a good public transports system. As a result, well-designed public transport should be done previous to forbid cars in the city.
By way of conclusion, with all the proofs prenominated, I am of the opinion that the forbiddance of private car ought to apply in city. Government may achieve enormous success in not only protect the environment but also keeping the health for citizen, which offer excellent prospects about an ideal-to-live precinct.
At the present time, congestion is becoming popular in several
cities
because
of overwhelming vehicles that leads the city is not ideal precinct to
live
. Thereby,
some
governments
consider to prohibit
individual
cars
in urban areas. I
am convinced
that this law should
be done
because
some
reasons which are the polluted exhaust, traffic system
as well
as gaining benefits to citizens.
The most significant reason is pollution from
car
fumes, which is in
danger
to human’s health causing respiratory diseases such as asthma and bronchitis.
Furthermore
, smoke from
car
results in the warmer climate and destroying the ozone layer.
A second reason why I am in favor of
cars
being banned
is that
many
cities
were not designed for motor traffic. A
good
example of this is Ho Chi Minh, the central city in the south of
Viet
Nam, which has narrow streets and lack of parking lot.
Hence
, traffic jam
usually
occur at the rush hour and parking a
car
extremely
difficult in this area.
Finally
,
people
can save
greatly
money by taking advantage of public transports
instead
of private
cars
.
In addition
,
people
may be safer when they
must
not drive in
some
dangerous
cases such as drinking alcohol and having phone calls.
On the other hand
, the prohibition of private
cars
might be impossible in several underdeveloped countries that do not have a
good
public transports system.
As a result
, well-designed public transport should
be done
previous to forbid
cars
in the city.
By way of conclusion, with all the proofs
prenominated
, I am of the opinion that the
forbiddance
of private
car
ought to apply in city.
Government
may achieve enormous success in not
only
protect the environment
but
also
keeping the health for citizen, which offer excellent prospects about an ideal-to-
live
precinct.