Art have always proven itself to be a great escape for over occupied human. Which is why people think that government should render ample finance to the arts, but myriads believe that there are other important things where funds should be spent. This essay will elaborates the possible agreements or disagreements of this view.
A country can achieve huge success by using art as a tool. As there are many people who cannot show their talent to the world as they do not have enough money to get the knack. moreover, government can provide small loans for people who are deft in their work so that they can open their own business and live a better life. In addition to that, the government can make wealth by opening museums showing dexterities of people, where no only people from other countries can visit and but it will be leisure time for over worked people as well.
In contrast, one should not forget that the same money can be disbursed on getting rid of pollution, corruption, unemployment and homelessness. Authorities can use their capital to make alternatives of pollutants. Furthermore, funds can be spent on recruitment process to make it more genuine which will automatically diminish unemployment. Last but not least, government can make old age or homes for homeless people to eradicate homelessness.
In conclusion, where country's growth is a vindication for acceptance of given view, there proofs like adulteration, joblessness ink the denial of this view. I think, regimes should prudently spend money on the arts as well as other country building factors.
Art
have always proven itself to be a great escape for over occupied human. Which is why
people
think
that
government
should render ample finance to the
arts
,
but
myriads believe that there are other
important
things where funds should
be spent
. This essay will
elaborates
the possible agreements or disagreements of this view.
A country can achieve huge success by using
art
as a tool. As there are
many
people
who cannot
show
their talent to the world as they do not have
enough
money to
get
the knack.
moreover
,
government
can provide
small
loans for
people
who are deft in their work
so
that they can open their
own
business and
live
a better life.
In addition
to that, the
government
can
make
wealth by opening museums showing
dexterities
of
people
, where no
only
people
from other countries can visit and
but
it will be leisure time for over worked
people
as well
.
In contrast
, one should not forget that the same money can
be disbursed
on getting rid of pollution, corruption, unemployment and homelessness. Authorities can
use
their capital to
make
alternatives of pollutants.
Furthermore
, funds can
be spent
on recruitment process to
make
it more genuine which will
automatically
diminish unemployment. Last
but
not least,
government
can
make
old
age or homes for homeless
people
to eradicate homelessness.
In conclusion
, where country's growth is a vindication for acceptance of
given
view, there proofs like adulteration, joblessness ink the denial of this view. I
think
, regimes should
prudently
spend money on the
arts
as well
as other country building factors.