Smoking has a detrimental effect on health, and all around the world consuming all tobacco products is a major issue for the public health. Some people think that the governments should restrict or ban them. I will discuss drawback and positive effect of banning smoking in this essay in my perspective.
Clearly, to take care of the public health is a significant duty for the governments. One of the crucial problems is smoking, especially indoor consuming. It causes some death diseases such as breathing problems and other respiratory illnesses, even if lung cancer. It is believed that it is not only personal restriction, also the governments banning is necessary for decreasing consuming tobacco products. For instance, in a survey which has been done at a local university in Turkey, in the years 1980 between 2000, only 5 percent consuming cigarette had decreased important rate of respiratory illness among 1000 people. That is to say, if the illnesses wan to decline, the number of smokers is decreasing, too.
On the other hand, some people believe that banned something is effected harmful to individuals. They insist everyone is responsible only their health. That is accurate in a way, but nobody should not affect the others. When a person smoke, all people are in there suffered with detrimental chemicals which in the cigarette, doubtless. Meanwhile, the governments should educate the people have that mentality to care about health issues are caused by smoking.
In conclusion, although restricting smoking can not affect public health. The government should educate the people be aware both heath themselves and others in order to ban smoking indoors, even if be restricted sales.
Smoking
has a detrimental effect on
health
, and all around the world consuming all tobacco products is a major issue for the public
health
.
Some
people
think
that the
governments
should restrict or ban them. I will discuss drawback and
positive
effect of banning
smoking
in this essay in my perspective.
Clearly
, to take care of the public
health
is a significant duty for the
governments
. One of the crucial problems is
smoking
,
especially
indoor consuming. It causes
some
death diseases such as breathing problems and
other
respiratory illnesses, even if lung cancer. It
is believed
that it is not
only
personal restriction,
also
the
governments
banning is necessary for decreasing consuming tobacco products.
For instance
, in a survey which has
been done
at a local university in Turkey, in the years 1980 between 2000,
only
5 percent consuming cigarette had decreased
important
rate of respiratory illness among 1000
people
.
That is
to say, if the illnesses wan to decline, the number of smokers is decreasing, too.
On the
other
hand,
some
people
believe that banned something
is effected
harmful to individuals. They insist everyone is responsible
only
their
health
.
That is
accurate in a way,
but
nobody should not affect the others. When a person smoke, all
people
are in there suffered with detrimental chemicals which in the cigarette, doubtless. Meanwhile, the
governments
should educate the
people
have that mentality to care about
health
issues
are caused
by smoking.
In conclusion
, although restricting
smoking
can not affect public
health
. The
government
should educate the
people
be aware both heath themselves
and others
in order to ban
smoking
indoors, even if
be restricted
sales.