In a corporate world, it is a standard hiring procedure to collect the personal details of prospective employees such as how do they spend their leisure time, and what is their marital status. Some people support this argument as they believe that this practice would help employers to find the most suitable candidate for vacancies. However, others hold the narrative that this approach could enforce talented candidates to not apply for a job as they believe that it would compromise their privacy. In this essay, I will illustrate both of the arguments and give my own opinion.
On one hand, proponents of this approach argue that as it is essential for an employer to find the perfect match amongst a vast number of applications received for a position and often this task is given to a hiring team who requests personal information before recruiting a candidate. They opine that several jobs require people to work in a rotating shift environment and in this regard employers often look for a candidate who does not have any reservations to work in nights as well as in the evenings. For such kind of positions, employers often prefer a person who is not married and does not have family commitments. For instance, research suggests that in order to enhance the productivity I. T companies prefer to recruit those candidates who are single and who have an interest in computer technologies. As a result, they argue, that not only candidates focus and fulfil their responsibilities diligently but being an unmarried person allows them to work flexibly such as in nights or on weekends.
On the other hand, detractors have their own viewpoint and they put forward the argument that the major drawback of this policy could be the decline in the talent pool of any country. It is no secret that people do vary in their nature, some are affable while the others are reserved and generally do not like to share their personal information with their friends and colleagues. In such situations, asking the prospective employees about their personal information could prompt them to drop their application for a job despite their abilities and relevant skills which would be the loss of society. For example, research conducted on human behavior suggested that a vast majority of professionals is working in the informal sector because they are reluctant to share their personal information and term it as a breach of privacy.
In conclusion, although collecting personal data of candidates may help employers to get the most suitable employee. However, I believe that employers should obtain the consent of candidates before getting their personal information and that it should not be made compulsory which as a result could provoke many skilful candidates to look for other opportunities. 
In a corporate world, it is a standard hiring procedure to collect the  
personal
  details
 of prospective employees such as how do they spend their leisure time, and what is their marital status.  
Some
  people
 support this argument as they believe that this practice would  
help
  employers
 to find the most suitable  
candidate
 for vacancies.  
However
, others hold the narrative that this approach could enforce talented  
candidates
 to not apply for a job as they believe that it would compromise their privacy. In this essay, I will illustrate both of the arguments and give my  
own
 opinion.
On one hand, proponents of this approach argue that as it is essential for an  
employer
 to find the perfect match amongst a vast number of applications received for a position and  
often
 this task is  
given
 to a hiring team  
who
 requests  
personal
  information
  before
 recruiting a  
candidate
. They opine that several jobs require  
people
 to work in a rotating shift environment and in this regard  
employers
  often
 look for a  
candidate
  who
 does not have any reservations to work in nights  
as well
 as in the evenings. For such kind of positions,  
employers
  often
 prefer a person  
who
 is not married and does not have family commitments.  
For instance
, research suggests that in order to enhance the productivity I. T  
companies
 prefer to recruit those  
candidates
  who
 are single and  
who
 have an interest in computer technologies.  
As a result
, they argue, that not  
only
  candidates
 focus and fulfil their responsibilities  
diligently
  but
 being an unmarried person  
allows
 them to work  
flexibly
 such as in nights or on weekends.
On the  
other
 hand, detractors have their  
own
  viewpoint and
 they put forward the argument that the major drawback of this policy could be the decline in the talent pool of any country. It is no secret that  
people
 do vary in their nature,  
some
 are affable while the others  
are reserved
 and  
generally
 do not like to share their  
personal
  information
 with their friends and colleagues. In such situations, asking the prospective employees about their  
personal
  information
 could prompt them to drop their application for a job despite their abilities and relevant  
skills
 which would be the loss of society.  
For example
, research conducted on human behavior suggested that a vast majority of professionals is working in the informal sector  
because
 they are reluctant to share their  
personal
  information
 and term it as a breach of privacy. 
In conclusion
, although collecting  
personal
 data of  
candidates
 may  
help
  employers
 to  
get
 the most suitable employee.  
However
, I believe that  
employers
 should obtain the consent of  
candidates
  before
 getting their  
personal
  information
 and that it should not  
be made
 compulsory which  
as a result
 could provoke  
many
  skilful
  candidates
 to look for  
other
 opportunities.