In a corporate world, it is a standard hiring procedure to collect the personal details of prospective employees such as how do they spend their leisure time, and what is their marital status. Some people support this argument as they believe that this practice would help employers to find the most suitable candidate for vacancies. However, others hold the narrative that this approach could enforce talented candidates to not apply for a job as they believe that it would compromise their privacy. In this essay, I will illustrate both of the arguments and give my own opinion.
On one hand, proponents of this approach argue that as it is essential for an employer to find the perfect match amongst a vast number of applications received for a position and often this task is given to a hiring team who requests personal information before recruiting a candidate. They opine that several jobs require people to work in a rotating shift environment and in this regard employers often look for a candidate who does not have any reservations to work in nights as well as in the evenings. For such kind of positions, employers often prefer a person who is not married and does not have family commitments. For instance, research suggests that in order to enhance the productivity I. T companies prefer to recruit those candidates who are single and who have an interest in computer technologies. As a result, they argue, that not only candidates focus and fulfil their responsibilities diligently but being an unmarried person allows them to work flexibly such as in nights or on weekends.
On the other hand, detractors have their own viewpoint and they put forward the argument that the major drawback of this policy could be the decline in the talent pool of any country. It is no secret that people do vary in their nature, some are affable while the others are reserved and generally do not like to share their personal information with their friends and colleagues. In such situations, asking the prospective employees about their personal information could prompt them to drop their application for a job despite their abilities and relevant skills which would be the loss of society. For example, research conducted on human behavior suggested that a vast majority of professionals is working in the informal sector because they are reluctant to share their personal information and term it as a breach of privacy.
In conclusion, although collecting personal data of candidates may help employers to get the most suitable employee. However, I believe that employers should obtain the consent of candidates before getting their personal information and that it should not be made compulsory which as a result could provoke many skilful candidates to look for other opportunities.
In a corporate world, it is a standard hiring procedure to collect the
personal
details
of prospective employees such as how do they spend their leisure time, and what is their marital status.
Some
people
support this argument as they believe that this practice would
help
employers
to find the most suitable
candidate
for vacancies.
However
, others hold the narrative that this approach could enforce talented
candidates
to not apply for a job as they believe that it would compromise their privacy. In this essay, I will illustrate both of the arguments and give my
own
opinion.
On one hand, proponents of this approach argue that as it is essential for an
employer
to find the perfect match amongst a vast number of applications received for a position and
often
this task is
given
to a hiring team
who
requests
personal
information
before
recruiting a
candidate
. They opine that several jobs require
people
to work in a rotating shift environment and in this regard
employers
often
look for a
candidate
who
does not have any reservations to work in nights
as well
as in the evenings. For such kind of positions,
employers
often
prefer a person
who
is not married and does not have family commitments.
For instance
, research suggests that in order to enhance the productivity I. T
companies
prefer to recruit those
candidates
who
are single and
who
have an interest in computer technologies.
As a result
, they argue, that not
only
candidates
focus and fulfil their responsibilities
diligently
but
being an unmarried person
allows
them to work
flexibly
such as in nights or on weekends.
On the
other
hand, detractors have their
own
viewpoint and
they put forward the argument that the major drawback of this policy could be the decline in the talent pool of any country. It is no secret that
people
do vary in their nature,
some
are affable while the others
are reserved
and
generally
do not like to share their
personal
information
with their friends and colleagues. In such situations, asking the prospective employees about their
personal
information
could prompt them to drop their application for a job despite their abilities and relevant
skills
which would be the loss of society.
For example
, research conducted on human behavior suggested that a vast majority of professionals is working in the informal sector
because
they are reluctant to share their
personal
information
and term it as a breach of privacy.
In conclusion
, although collecting
personal
data of
candidates
may
help
employers
to
get
the most suitable employee.
However
, I believe that
employers
should obtain the consent of
candidates
before
getting their
personal
information
and that it should not
be made
compulsory which
as a result
could provoke
many
skilful
candidates
to look for
other
opportunities.