Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Do you think it is better for governments to spend money developing public transportation or developing new kinds of cars? Why or why not? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. v.1

Do you think it is better for governments to spend money developing public transportation or developing new kinds of cars? Why or why not? v. 1
Nowadays, it is undoubtedly that the use of privative transports has been increasing, mainly in the last century. There are many reasons for this problem and lots of possible resolutions for it. In my point of view, the government should invest in the transportation service instead of in others technologies. Firstly, this increase is justified because buses and subways are uncomfortable, slow and most of the times delayed. Consequently, the population chose to buy their own vehicle to go to work or anywhere else. For example, a friend of mine works 30 minutes from her house, if she had used a bus to get there, she would spend one and a half hour. Secondly, if the public transportation is agreeable and affordable, the people will choose it instead of driving by themselves alone in traffic jams every day, spending fuel and resources. For instance, my husband would travel by subway since if they were enjoyable. However, he prefers to spend more capital on petrol by using his car since even if there is traffic jams, driving by his own is faster than using a metro. Thirdly, to develop new automobile, which pollute less than the current ones, will need time to it, and a great quantity of money. At this time, it is inaccessible and unlikely. It may be cheaper and easier to improve the actual. As an illustration, it is economical to reformer buses and rain wail than invest in technological studies that would cost years to solve the issue. To sum up, the rise of privative transports has been improving the pollution and it is necessary that the government tries to solve it. There are many choices to be made. Nevertheless, I believe that to improve and invest in public transportation will resolve it better and more reasonable than investing in new kinds of car.
Nowadays, it is
undoubtedly
that the
use
of
privative
transports has been increasing,
mainly
in the last century. There are
many
reasons for this problem and lots of possible resolutions for it. In my point of view, the
government
should invest in the transportation service
instead
of in others technologies.

Firstly
, this increase
is justified
because
buses and subways are uncomfortable, slow and
most of the times
delayed.
Consequently
, the population chose to
buy
their
own
vehicle to go to work or anywhere else.
For example
, a friend of mine works 30 minutes from her
house
, if she had
used
a bus to
get
there, she would spend one and a half hour.

Secondly
, if the public transportation is agreeable and affordable, the
people
will choose it
instead
of driving by themselves alone in traffic jams every day, spending fuel and resources.
For instance
, my husband would travel by subway since if they were enjoyable.
However
, he prefers to spend more capital on petrol by using his car since even if there is traffic jams, driving by his
own
is faster than using a metro.

Thirdly
, to develop new automobile, which pollute less than the
current
ones, will need time to it, and a great quantity of money. At this time, it is inaccessible and unlikely. It may be cheaper and easier to
improve
the actual. As an illustration, it is economical to reformer buses and rain wail than invest in technological studies that would cost years to solve the issue.

To sum up, the rise of
privative
transports has been improving the pollution and it is necessary that the
government
tries to solve it. There are
many
choices to
be made
.
Nevertheless
, I believe that to
improve
and invest in public transportation will resolve it better and more reasonable than investing in new kinds of car.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8Mistakes
A special kind of beauty exists which is born in language, of language, and for language.
Gaston Bachelard

IELTS essay Do you think it is better for governments to spend money developing public transportation or developing new kinds of cars? Why or why not? v. 1

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
307 words
8
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 8.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 8.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 8.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 8.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts