Environmental issues have won people' s attention in the recent years. They directly affect people' s lives. Some NGOs increase people' s awareness. They try to inform people about potential threats that imperil their livings. Some people are of the opinion that everyone should take an appropriate action for reducing the harmful effects on the environment while others hold the opposite opinion. Even though people should participate in various programs to compensate their negative influence, but I insist that the most important duty is to the government. In the following, I am willing to support my perspective by proposing two main arguments.
First and the foremost reason lies in the fact that effective measures need considerable authority. Some actions can be taken just by government. I concede that everyone is part of the solution. However, we by ourselves cannot make significant changes. On the other hand, we can encourage our friends to consider environmental effects of their decisions. For example, we can vote for those politicians who have effective plans for these problems. In addition, some measures need a high level of authority that only legislators have. For instance, they can ban the use of some materials that cause harms to some animal and plant species. In that case, they can take care of these problems by appropriation of funds for them. For example, they can spend money on removing waste materials from the seas.
Another subtle factor rests on the notion that benevolent actions by ordinary people can precipitate the existing problems. In other words, we have to consider various aspects of our actions. Environmental scientists should conduct research on these matters and propose a solution for them. There numerous cases that different scientists and experts have a paradoxical point of view about a problem. For example, in the last year, there was a group of local scientists who wanted to transfer some local animals to other parts of the world in order to save them from extinction. However, some scientists in the country opposed to their action since they thought that it might put other species lives to danger. In that case, they provide further information which those experts did not consider.
To sum up, I would like to point out that governments should take action to environmental issues. However, people can indirectly have a great impact on the government' s policies and strategies. Not only are the government able to make great decisions and power but they have also more knowledge than individuals. We all should remember that our environment belongs to all of the creatures. Therefore, we should not violate their living right.
Environmental
issues have won
people&
#039; s attention in the recent years. They
directly
affect
people&
#039; s
lives
.
Some
NGOs increase
people&
#039; s awareness. They try to inform
people
about potential threats that imperil their livings.
Some
people
are of the opinion that everyone should take an appropriate
action
for reducing the harmful effects on the environment while others hold the opposite opinion.
Even though
people
should participate in various programs to compensate their
negative
influence,
but
I insist that the most
important
duty is to the
government
. In the following, I am willing to support my perspective by proposing two main arguments.
First
and the foremost reason lies in the fact that effective measures need considerable authority.
Some
actions can
be taken
just
by
government
. I concede that everyone is part of the solution.
However
, we by ourselves cannot
make
significant
changes
. On the
other
hand, we can encourage our friends to consider
environmental
effects of their decisions.
For example
, we can vote for those politicians who have effective plans for these
problems
.
In addition
,
some
measures need a high level of authority that
only
legislators have.
For instance
, they can ban the
use
of
some
materials that cause harms to
some
animal and plant species.
In that case
, they can take care of these
problems
by appropriation of funds for them.
For example
, they can spend money on removing waste materials from the seas.
Another subtle factor rests on the notion that benevolent actions by ordinary
people
can precipitate the existing
problems
. In
other
words, we
have to
consider various aspects of our actions.
Environmental
scientists
should conduct research on these matters and propose a solution for them. There numerous cases that
different
scientists
and experts have a paradoxical point of view about a
problem
.
For example
, in the last year, there was a group of local
scientists
who wanted to transfer
some
local animals to
other
parts of the world in order to save them from extinction.
However
,
some
scientists
in the country opposed to their
action
since they
thought
that it might put
other
species
lives
to
danger
.
In that case
, they provide
further
information which those experts did not consider.
To sum up, I would like to point out that
governments
should take
action
to
environmental
issues.
However
,
people
can
indirectly
have a great impact on the
government&
#039; s policies and strategies. Not
only
are the
government
able to
make
great decisions and power
but
they have
also
more knowledge than individuals. We all should remember that our environment belongs to
all of the
creatures.
Therefore
, we should not violate their living right.