Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to finish a project completely and then begin another project than to work on two or more projects at the same time. v.770

It is better to finish a project completely and then begin another project than to work on two or more projects at the same time. v. 770
The modern life is a place of competition for the doing and presentation of different projects. Perhaps the most significant milestone of these presentations is the quality them. While some people are in the conviction that the handling one task in each attempt is a sound idea; others, on the other hand, believe otherwise. I absolutely agree with the first group and will cogently explicate my stance on this issue in what follows. The first reason which shapes my outlook is that the focusing and handling a sole issue is convenient. In fact, each project can be considered as a duty for the person acceptance it. Moreover, the fundamental aspect of each mission is the best presentation. If an individual does not provide the adequate function in the particular task, his effort will be abortive and meaningless. By considering that, the acceptance of enormous responsibilities at the same time can lead to the decrement of the person' s function. A vivid example can be given to shed light on the subject is my own instance. When I was a university student, for one semester I picked two practical projects, architecture design and project management, it was a very arduous task to concentrate on both duties at the same time. As a result, I gained lower mark in both of them. However, I picked each of them in one semester; I would be able to pass them with the best record. The second factor which advocates my idea is that the focusing in one issue means fewer mistakes. Indeed, as there is a sufficient span of time for the presentation, the feasibility of the failure is small. Therefore, the opportunity of the best outcome is more than the handling the various tasks in the identical period. According to the noteworthy, intelligence survey conducted in my country, by the decrement of the span required for a particular task into a half, the possibility of error is doubled. In this condition, the different duties at the same time lead to a short period of their preparation. This study lucidly explains that the sufficient time for the function is the crucial element for the success. Nevertheless, some people may assume that by doing two or more jobs at the same time, they can be fast. Moreover, today' s hectic lifestyle demands this rapid pace. However, they overlook the importance of the result. As mentioned above, if the works' outcomes possess the lots errors, the fast speed is useless; since people should redo the previous tasks to modify their failures. Consequently, they repeat the same time, and it is more time consuming than doing a sole job. This condition thoroughly demonstrates the speed and validity of doing one task. To wrap it up, all aforementioned reasons can lead us to the logical result that it is better to finish one task and then initiate the other one. The focusing in one issue, the task will be easy to handle, it will end to fewer mistakes; moreover, it will be done in the shorter period. All in all, I firmly recommend the finishing one job and then the starting another task to be sure of its outcome and success.
The modern life is a place of competition for the
doing
and
presentation
of
different
projects
. Perhaps the most significant milestone of these
presentations
is the quality them. While
some
people
are in the conviction that the handling one
task
in each attempt is a sound
idea
; others,
on the other hand
, believe
otherwise
. I
absolutely
agree
with the
first
group and will
cogently
explicate my stance on this
issue
in what follows.

The
first
reason which shapes my outlook is that the focusing and handling a sole
issue
is convenient. In fact, each
project
can
be considered
as a duty for the person acceptance it.
Moreover
, the fundamental aspect of each mission is the best
presentation
. If an individual does not provide the adequate function in the particular
task
, his effort will be abortive and meaningless. By considering that, the acceptance of enormous responsibilities at the same
time
can lead to the decrement of the
person&
#039; s function. A vivid example can be
given
to shed light on the subject is my
own
instance. When I was a university student, for one semester I picked two practical
projects
, architecture design and
project
management, it was a
very
arduous
task
to concentrate on both duties at the same
time
.
As a result
, I gained lower mark in both of them.
However
, I picked each of them in one semester; I would be able to pass them with the best record.

The second factor which advocates my
idea
is that the focusing in one
issue
means fewer mistakes.
Indeed
, as there is a sufficient span of
time
for the
presentation
, the feasibility of the failure is
small
.
Therefore
, the opportunity of the best outcome is more than the handling the various
tasks
in the identical period. According to the noteworthy, intelligence survey conducted in my country, by the decrement of the span required for a particular
task
into a half, the possibility of error
is doubled
. In this condition, the
different
duties at the same
time
lead to a short period of their preparation. This study
lucidly
explains
that the sufficient
time
for the function is the crucial element for the success.

Nevertheless
,
some
people
may assume that by
doing
two or more jobs at the same
time
, they can be
fast
.
Moreover
,
today&
#039; s hectic lifestyle demands this rapid pace.
However
, they overlook the importance of the result. As mentioned above, if the
works&
#039; outcomes possess
the lots errors
, the
fast
speed is useless; since
people
should redo the previous
tasks
to modify their failures.
Consequently
, they repeat the same
time
, and it is more
time consuming
than
doing
a sole job. This condition
thoroughly
demonstrates the speed and validity of
doing
one task.

To wrap it up, all aforementioned reasons can lead us to the logical result that it is better to finish one
task
and then initiate the other one. The focusing in one
issue
, the
task
will be easy to handle, it will
end
to fewer mistakes;
moreover
, it will
be done
in the shorter period. All in all, I
firmly
recommend the finishing one job and then the starting another
task
to be sure of its outcome and success.
15Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
33Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
5Mistakes
Language is not a genetic gift, it is a social gift. Learning a new language is becoming a member of the club – the community of speakers of that language.
Frank Smith

IELTS essay It is better to finish a project completely and then begin another project than to work on two or more projects at the same time. v. 770

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
533 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts