It is believed that carry bags made up of plastic materials should be banned due to its major contribution towards polluting soil and the ocean. Owing to this, some people deem that it should be prohibited. I am in accord with the statement and this essay will also discuss the possible reasons.
To commence with, once the plastic starts to get amalgamated with the soil, it will remain in the ecosystem of the land because it is non-biodegradable. As a result, the fertility of particular land will be reduced and eventually make it futile. Additionally, if plastic is burnt, then it will release harmful chemicals such create perilous eventualities for every living organism. So, it should be banned. Furthermore, land animals cannot digest the plastic materials. So, they will suffer from various diseases, if they eat plastic. For example, according to one survey, more than half of population of land animals is dying due to plastic eating. Hence, it can be substantiated that plastic should be excluded.
Moreover, Marine lives will face danger because plastic will not only decrease the oxygen level in the sea but will also cause harm to their habitats and on top of that marine lives will also die due to the habit of eating plastic. In addition to that, it should be banned due to the lack of awareness amidst people. To illustrate, people always throw plastic trash in the oceans that gradually contaminates it. Therefore, it is justifiable that plastic materials should be prohibited.
However, instead of stopping its production, it should be recycled due to various reasons. Firstly, it is easy to carry because of its light weight. Secondly, it is cheaper than any other materials as well as easily available. To exemplify, shopping centres always charge more for paper bags and less for plastic bags. Though, I uphold the notion that plastic materials should be banned.
In conclusion, agglomerating all the above mentioned points, I believe that it should be forbidden because of its devastating implications for nature and it is recommended that researchers should find ways to recycle it.
It
is believed
that carry bags made up of
plastic
materials
should
be banned
due
to its major contribution towards polluting soil and the ocean. Owing to this,
some
people
deem that it should
be prohibited
. I am in accord with the statement and this essay will
also
discuss the possible reasons.
To commence with, once the
plastic
starts
to
get
amalgamated with the soil, it will remain in the ecosystem of the
land
because
it is non-biodegradable.
As a result
, the fertility of particular
land
will be
reduced
and
eventually
make
it futile.
Additionally
, if
plastic
is burnt
, then it will release harmful chemicals such create perilous eventualities for every living organism.
So
, it should
be banned
.
Furthermore
,
land
animals cannot digest the
plastic
materials
.
So
, they will suffer from various diseases, if they eat
plastic
.
For example
, according to one survey, more than half of population of
land
animals is dying
due
to
plastic
eating.
Hence
, it can
be substantiated
that
plastic
should
be excluded
.
Moreover
, Marine
lives
will face
danger
because
plastic
will not
only
decrease the oxygen level in the sea
but
will
also
cause harm to their habitats and
on top of that
marine
lives
will
also
die
due
to the habit of eating
plastic
.
In addition
to that, it should
be banned
due
to the lack of awareness amidst
people
. To illustrate,
people
always throw
plastic
trash in the oceans that
gradually
contaminates it.
Therefore
, it is justifiable that
plastic
materials
should
be prohibited
.
However
,
instead
of stopping its production, it should
be recycled
due
to various reasons.
Firstly
, it is easy to carry
because
of its light weight.
Secondly
, it is cheaper than any other
materials
as well
as
easily
available. To exemplify, shopping
centres
always charge more for paper bags and less for
plastic
bags.
Though
, I uphold the notion that
plastic
materials
should
be banned
.
In conclusion
, agglomerating all the above mentioned points, I believe that it should
be forbidden
because
of its devastating implications for nature and it
is recommended
that researchers should find ways to recycle it.