The discussion whether young adults ought to choose advancing their education by attending universities or serving their countries by working raises a thorny question. While there are some opponents of doing jobs as builders or car mechanics, I would argue that it had better to deem getting higher education.
According to some people, the option to get involved in jobs might be beneficial for a range of reasons. To begin with, people are likely to get profits at their early ages. As they start earning money, they could possibly be able to cover the basic needs. Not only the youngsters can take advantage of this salary, but also parents could stop worrying about the children's payments. Furthermore, people are more likely to get an experience which might not be learnt from textbooks. Since education places tend to concentrate on theoretical lessons, individuals are on the verge of being experienced just by participating in classes.
However, others, including me, consider that the role of the educational background is irreplaceable. The vital point is that the countries might not be well-served without professional knowledge which is given by universities. Uneducated doctors can be appropriate samples of it as the population may not be contributed by them. To be more clear, doctors can not do their jobs professionally until having enough knowledge. Moreover, some people might not be able to find jobs easily as employees with higher education levels are usually prioritized. Thus, there is an ongoing competition in the companies due to the limited vacancies. Consequently, higher educated individuals cannot be replaced by inexperienced working class.
In conclusion, while some argue that the best way to serve the country is working instead of getting education, I would claim educational background can never be outweighed.
The discussion whether young adults ought to choose advancing their
education
by attending universities or serving their countries by working raises a thorny question. While there are
some
opponents of doing
jobs
as builders or car mechanics, I would argue that it had better to deem getting higher education.
According to
some
people
, the option to
get
involved in
jobs
might
be beneficial for a range of reasons. To
begin
with,
people
are likely to
get
profits at their early ages. As they
start
earning money, they could
possibly
be able to cover the basic needs. Not
only
the youngsters can take advantage of this salary,
but
also
parents could
stop
worrying about the children's payments.
Furthermore
,
people
are more likely to
get
an experience which
might
not be
learnt
from textbooks. Since
education
places tend to concentrate on theoretical lessons, individuals are on the verge of
being experienced
just
by participating in classes.
However
, others, including me, consider that the role of the educational background is irreplaceable. The vital point is that the countries
might
not be well-served without professional knowledge which is
given
by universities. Uneducated doctors can be appropriate samples of it as the population may not
be contributed
by them. To be more
clear
, doctors can not do their
jobs
professionally
until having
enough
knowledge.
Moreover
,
some
people
might
not be able to find
jobs
easily
as employees with higher
education
levels are
usually
prioritized.
Thus
, there is an ongoing competition in the
companies
due to the limited vacancies.
Consequently
, higher educated individuals cannot
be replaced
by inexperienced working
class
.
In conclusion
, while
some
argue that the best way to serve the country is working
instead
of getting
education
, I would claim educational background can never
be outweighed
.