Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Do you agree or disagree that universities should spend money on improving facilities (labs and general requirements) than hiring famous teachers? v.2

that universities should spend money on improving facilities (labs and general requirements) than hiring famous teachers? v. 2
As a matter of fact, an experienced teacher can make a big difference on student' s study during a year, so universities and colleges are serious in choosing a person, who wants to teach their students. On the other hand, facilities are necessary for most majors such as chemistry. Therefore, some people think that universities should invest on teachers and some of them think otherwise. In my view, I strongly believe that financial departments in schools should spend money on upgrading facilities. First and foremost, famous teachers are busy. They do not have enough time to answer student' s questions completely. Consequently, they are not effective on student' s knowledge. As an illustration, my brother-in-law was in Irvine University for four years. He had a famous teacher, who had a really good experience in his major, but he could not make an appointment with him during the semester, because he was busy with his researches and other big projects. Second, paying money to some famous teachers is a short time investment. Undoubtedly, these teachers will have many attractive offers during each semester, so they can choose between varieties of offers each year. Obviously, best offer has a big chance to be chosen. As everybody knows, each university has a determined budget for each year, so rich universities have a better chance to get these teachers. For instance, University of Arkansas hired a top rate teacher for Business School in 2013. All students were satisfied with their new professor, but after a while, she got a better offer in California University in San Marcos, so she left her job in Arkansas after one semester and moved to California. The point is that the University of Arkansas lost a lot of money for paying her salary and her moving expenses. Last but not least, universities should pay two expenses by hiring a high salary teacher, because they cannot skip essential facilities for students. Most majors need to have tools and machines for their study and universities should replace them frequently, because some of them are perishable. To sum up, although hiring a famous teacher is a kind of investment for schools, they have to be rich to cover all university’s expenses.
As a matter of fact, an experienced
teacher
can
make
a
big
difference on
student&
#039; s study during a
year
,
so
universities
and colleges are serious in choosing a person, who wants to teach their
students
.
On the other hand
, facilities are necessary for most majors such as chemistry.
Therefore
,
some
people
think
that
universities
should invest on
teachers
and
some
of them
think
otherwise
. In my view, I
strongly
believe that financial departments in schools should spend money on upgrading facilities.

First
and foremost,
famous
teachers
are busy. They do not have
enough
time to answer
student&
#039; s questions completely.
Consequently
, they are not effective on
student&
#039; s knowledge. As an illustration, my brother-in-law was in Irvine
University
for four years. He had a
famous
teacher
, who had a
really
good
experience in his major,
but
he could not
make
an appointment with him during the semester,
because
he was busy with his researches and other
big
projects.

Second, paying money to
some
famous
teachers
is a short time investment.
Undoubtedly
, these
teachers
will have
many
attractive
offers
during each semester,
so
they can choose between varieties of
offers
each
year
.
Obviously
, best
offer
has a
big
chance to
be chosen
. As everybody knows, each
university
has a determined budget for each
year
,
so
rich
universities
have a better chance to
get
these
teachers
.
For instance
,
University
of Arkansas hired a top rate
teacher
for Business School in 2013. All
students
were satisfied
with their new professor,
but
after a while, she
got
a better
offer
in California
University
in San Marcos,
so
she
left
her job in Arkansas after one semester and
moved
to California. The point is that the
University
of Arkansas lost
a lot of
money for paying her salary and her moving expenses.

Last
but
not least,
universities
should pay two expenses by hiring a high salary
teacher
,
because
they cannot skip essential facilities for
students
. Most majors need to have tools and machines for their study and
universities
should replace them
frequently
,
because
some
of them are perishable.

To sum up, although hiring a
famous
teacher
is a kind of investment for schools, they
have to
be rich to cover all
university’s
expenses.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
38Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
4Mistakes

IELTS essay that universities should spend money on improving facilities (labs and general requirements) than hiring famous teachers? v. 2

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
369 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts