Some people argue that accessing to university is a right of all people no matter poor or rich and government should provide the opportunity for all people to study free in university. However, I believe free educating is a right of all people without regard to their financial background, but it cannot be practical for government.
On the one hand, it is true that all people should have a right to access to university and educating during their life because high educating people have a more chance to employ, since nowadays more jobs require knowledge and skills. For example, for getting a high level of jobs and well-paid careers such as doctor, lawyer and engineer need to study in university. As a result, without such founding poor section of society would be perpetuated and society as a whole would suffer; therefore, low income background would not have an opportunity to develop their talent and level of life.
On the other hand, it is reasonable providing free university for all people poor or reach is not practical for government no matter they are wealthy or not due to the fact that universities need invest and source of revenue for providing many aspects such as books and facilities, so that earn this budget from student. Consequently, government does not have enough budget for free university; besides, reach people for attending to university do not need to give fund from government because they can pay their tuition; government cannot pay money for the rich as well as the poor, so the national budget of government is better to support other aspects of society such as health care and the environment.
In conclusion, I believe, although attending to university is a right of all people poor or rich, but it is not necessary government support all people in society because it is not practical.
Some
people
argue that accessing to
university
is a
right
of all
people
no matter
poor
or rich and
government
should provide the opportunity for all
people
to study
free
in
university
.
However
, I believe
free
educating is a
right
of all
people
without regard to their financial background,
but
it cannot be practical for
government
.
On the one hand, it is true that all
people
should have a
right
to access to
university
and educating during their life
because
high educating
people
have a more chance to employ, since nowadays more jobs require knowledge and
skills
.
For example
, for getting a high level of jobs and well-paid careers such as doctor, lawyer and engineer need to study in
university
.
As a result
, without such founding
poor
section of
society
would
be perpetuated
and
society
as a whole would suffer;
therefore
, low income background would not have an opportunity to develop their talent and level of life.
On the other hand
, it is reasonable providing
free
university
for all
people
poor
or reach is not practical for
government
no matter they are wealthy or not due to the fact that
universities
need invest and source of revenue for providing
many
aspects such as books and facilities,
so
that earn this budget from student.
Consequently
,
government
does not have
enough
budget for
free
university
;
besides
, reach
people
for attending to
university
do not need to give fund from
government
because
they can pay their tuition;
government
cannot pay money for the rich
as well
as the
poor
,
so
the national budget of
government
is better to support other aspects of
society
such as health care and the environment.
In conclusion
, I believe, although attending to
university
is a
right
of all
people
poor
or rich,
but
it is not necessary
government
support all
people
in
society
because
it is not practical.