The artists have brought a considerable change for the improvement of a nation. Hence, the liberty should always devote the creative artists in order to express their concepts to people in any method as they want. Therefore, the authority should encourage them instead of prohibiting their works. I completely agree with this view of devoting right to the artists to express their notions by the elected officials.
First of all, it is an undeniable fact that a creative person has the power to combat for justice. This is because these days, people have to face various social issues such as rape, domestic violence and murder. In addition, creative artists can spread awareness via using own's creativity and motivate the people to speak against such violence. For instance, in India, artists had composed a song against the rape of 12 year old girl. This song not only gain the popularity, but also enforce the law to take firsthand actions. As a result, she had got justice, which is only possible by an artist diligence.
Furthermore, although the creative artists do not acquire sufficient amenities from the legislation, they can accelerate the national economy. Because artists conserve the culture, tradition, sculpture of a country in the museum and art -gallery. Hence, the tourists arrive to explore diverse cultures which increase job employment, especially in the tourism fields and rise economic status of a nation. To illustrate, masses work as a translator and tourist guide to support the holidaymakers which not only improve their communication skills, but also rise the demand of creative persons tremendously at a global level. Hence, the lawmaker stimulates the artist's work by providing medals to them rather than restricting on their freedom to show their thoughts.
In conclusion, the creative individual's determination and diligent should be praised by the governments in order to create awareness among public and expand the prosperity of the state.
The
artists
have brought a considerable
change
for the improvement of a nation.
Hence
, the liberty should always devote the
creative
artists
in order to express their concepts to
people
in any method as they want.
Therefore
, the authority should encourage them
instead
of prohibiting their works. I completely
agree
with this view of devoting right to the
artists
to express their notions by the elected officials.
First of all
, it is an undeniable fact that a
creative
person has the power to combat for justice. This is
because
these days,
people
have to
face various social issues such as rape, domestic violence and murder.
In addition
,
creative
artists
can spread awareness via using
own's
creativity and motivate the
people
to speak against such violence.
For instance
, in India,
artists
had composed a song against the rape of 12 year
old
girl. This song not
only
gain the popularity,
but
also
enforce the law to take firsthand actions.
As a result
, she had
got
justice, which is
only
possible by an
artist
diligence.
Furthermore
, although the
creative
artists
do not acquire sufficient amenities from the legislation, they can accelerate the national economy.
Because
artists
conserve the culture, tradition, sculpture of a country in the museum and art -gallery.
Hence
, the tourists arrive to explore diverse cultures which increase job employment,
especially
in the tourism fields and rise economic status of a nation. To illustrate, masses work as a translator and tourist guide to support the holidaymakers which not
only
improve
their communication
skills
,
but
also
rise the demand of
creative
persons
tremendously
at a global level.
Hence
, the lawmaker stimulates the artist's work by providing medals to them
rather
than restricting on their freedom to
show
their thoughts.
In conclusion
, the
creative
individual's determination and diligent should
be praised
by the
governments
in order to create awareness among public and expand the prosperity of the state.