Nowadays, almost all countries use fossil fuels as the main sources of power. However, in some developing countries, different resources are used more because of its positive effect. In my opinion, I partly agree with both ideas because each of them has its own advantages and disadvantages.
On the one hand, fossil fuels are actually easy to exploit in the several mountains and underground. Moreover, infrastructure, factories and household appliances are available and operate mainly on fossil fuels. So instead of spending money on equipment, they can use fossil fuels to save more, because of their popularity. While there is several negative side of using different resource compared to fossil fuels. But non-renewable power has a mighty impact on the environment. For example, vehicles and factories are releasing a huge amount of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere nowadays because of the tremendous gas and petrol used in them. For that reason, non-renewable energy is replaced by the renewable one to reduce the emission level in the atmosphere and improve the air quality.
On the other hand, unlimited resource is available and environmentally friendly, residents' life and health become better. However, amounts of trouble that residents will be encountered when replacing the fossil fuels with alternative energy. Both the government and families would be faced with the financial burden as they will have to pay millions of money in purchasing new equipment and facilities those could be accessed to use the natural power. For instance, the government needs to build factories and energy conversion stations to produce natural capacity and households must buy new electric vehicles to reduce emissions to the environment.
To sum up, although the fossil fuel and renewable capacity also have the positive and negative, in my opinion, using the alternative capacity will be a trend in the future due to its environmental friendly.
Nowadays, almost all countries
use
fossil
fuels
as the main sources of power.
However
, in
some
developing countries
,
different
resources are
used
more
because
of its
positive
effect. In my opinion, I partly
agree
with both
ideas
because
each of them has its
own
advantages and disadvantages.
On the one hand,
fossil
fuels
are actually easy to exploit in the several mountains and underground.
Moreover
, infrastructure, factories and household appliances are available and operate
mainly
on
fossil
fuels
.
So
instead
of spending money on equipment, they can
use
fossil
fuels
to save more,
because
of their popularity.
While
there is several
negative
side of using
different
resource compared to
fossil
fuels
.
But
non-renewable power has a mighty impact on the environment.
For example
, vehicles and factories are releasing a huge amount of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere nowadays
because
of the tremendous gas and petrol
used
in them. For that reason, non-renewable energy
is replaced
by the renewable one to
reduce
the emission level in the atmosphere and
improve
the air quality.
On the other hand
, unlimited resource is available and
environmentally
friendly, residents' life and health become better.
However
, amounts of trouble that residents will
be encountered
when replacing the
fossil
fuels
with alternative energy. Both the
government
and families would
be faced
with the financial burden as they will
have to
pay millions of money in purchasing new equipment and facilities those could
be accessed
to
use
the natural power.
For instance
, the
government
needs to build factories and energy conversion stations to produce natural capacity and households
must
buy
new electric vehicles to
reduce
emissions to the environment.
To sum up, although the
fossil
fuel
and renewable capacity
also
have the
positive
and
negative
, in my opinion, using the alternative capacity will be a trend in the future due to its environmental friendly.