It is true that people work at home with the modern technologies being much more convenient compared to going to the companies. While I accept that this may suit for managers, I disagree that working at home is better for employees.
On the one hand, there a variety of reasons why employers gain some benefits when their staffs working from their houses. One reason is that directors can narrow the generation gap between family members. As they can control their employees everywhere by technology devices, so they may be combined their work with their family life like travel or family affairs, which is a major advantage if they are parents of young children or they have old people to look after. In addition, employers can save a great deal of money, particularly in the big cities to rent a place where workers can work, invest facilities and pay for associated services. Thus, office workers take place their tasks from home is the best way in terms of managers in comparison with going to the companies every day.
On the other hand, there are many different drawbacks for workers who work at home without going to the offices. Firstly, they will have a hard time nurturing essential skills. To be specific, if they work in a corporation, they will have a good opportunity to work with lots of colleagues from different backgrounds, which enables them to gain directly the relevant experience; while if they work at home, they will not know how to build strong relationship with other employees and how to manage conflicts. Secondly, they cannot approach to the professional environment as the corporate culture which includes physical appearance, working style and team building activities.
In conclusion, it is certain that working at home through the leading edge technologies brings many advantages for employers, but this is by no means it is suitable for employees.
It is true that
people
work
at home with the modern technologies being much more convenient compared to going to the
companies
. While I accept that this may suit for managers, I disagree that
working
at home is better for employees.
On the one hand, there a variety of reasons why employers gain
some
benefits when their staffs
working
from their
houses
. One reason is that directors can narrow the generation gap between family members. As they can control their employees everywhere by technology devices,
so
they may
be combined
their
work
with their family life like travel or family affairs, which is a major advantage if they are parents of young
children or
they have
old
people
to look after.
In addition
, employers can save a great deal of money,
particularly
in the
big
cities to rent a place where workers can
work
, invest facilities and pay for associated services.
Thus
, office workers take place their tasks from home is the best way in terms of managers
in comparison
with going to the
companies
every day.
On the other hand
, there are
many
different
drawbacks for workers who
work
at home without going to the offices.
Firstly
, they will have a
hard
time nurturing essential
skills
. To be specific, if they
work
in a corporation, they will have a
good
opportunity to
work
with lots of colleagues from
different
backgrounds, which enables them to gain
directly
the relevant experience; while if they
work
at home, they will not know how to build strong relationship with other employees and how to manage conflicts.
Secondly
, they cannot approach to the professional environment as the corporate culture which includes physical appearance,
working
style and team building activities.
In conclusion
, it is certain that
working
at home through the leading edge technologies brings
many
advantages for employers,
but
this is by no means it is suitable for employees.