Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Communication through text messaging and other instant forms of online communication are short and basic. Some people think this will be the death of grammar and spelling. Do you agree or disagree? v.2

Communication through text messaging and other instant forms of online communication are short and basic. Some people think this will be the death of grammar and spelling. v. 2
One of the biggest boons of technology is the improvement in the means of communication. Arrival of tools for communication over the internet has really shrunk the world, but has led to debates on whether the text communication happening through such tools result in death of grammar and spelling. I disagree with this thought and explained my views in the following paragraphs Firstly, most of these text messaging applications come with a limit on the number of letters which makes the users focus only on the key message rather than on the correctness in grammar and spelling. For example, Twitter imposes a limit of 140 letters in the message which is too low to compose a message. The same happens with short messaging services provided by the telecom operators and the user have to pay more if they exceed this word limit and hence users have to send only the key part of the message keeping it short. Secondly, this fear has got very little to do with the latest online messaging systems. The restrictions on keeping the instant communication short is there since the time of telegrams. Telegrams also carried similar restrictions and yet helped people send clear and important messages faster. These new forms of online communication are nothing but a digital version of the telegram. In conclusion, using sentences without proper grammar and short forms of words are a necessary evolution for such tools because of these constraints. In places where users do not require an instant response, such as emails, they follow proper grammatical syntaxes and the spellings and hence it need not be considered to be a threat to the language.
One of the biggest boons of technology is the improvement in the means of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
communication
. Arrival of tools for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
communication
over the internet has
really
shrunk the world,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
has led to debates on whether the text
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
communication
happening through such tools result in death of grammar and spelling. I disagree with this
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
thought
and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
explained
my views in the following
Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraph
paragraphs


Firstly
, most of these text messaging applications
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
come
with a limit on the number of letters which
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
makes
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
users
focus
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
on the key
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
message
rather
than on the correctness in grammar and spelling.
For example
, Twitter imposes a limit of 140 letters in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
message
which is too low to compose a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
message
. The same happens with short messaging services provided by the telecom operators and the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
user
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
pay more if they exceed this word limit and
hence
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
users
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
send
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
the key part of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
message
keeping it short.

Secondly
, this fear has
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
got
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
little
to do with the latest online messaging systems. The restrictions on keeping the instant
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
communication
short is there since the time of telegrams. Telegrams
also
carried similar restrictions and
yet
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
helped
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
send
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
messages
faster. These new forms of online
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
communication
are nothing
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
a digital version of the telegram.

In conclusion
, using sentences without proper grammar and short forms of words are a necessary evolution for such tools
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of these constraints. In places where
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
users
do not require an instant response, such as emails, they follow proper grammatical
Possible spelling mistake found.
syntaxes
and the spellings and
hence
it need not
be considered
to be a threat to the language.
9Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
14Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
2Mistakes

IELTS essay Communication through text messaging and other instant forms of online communication are short and basic. Some people think this will be the death of grammar and spelling. v. 2

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
276 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts