The energy, which is produced by wind and solar, is more beneficial and less harmful as compare to the power, which is produced by coal, oil and gas. There are several reasons to proof that, this is positive development rather than negative development. For example, carbon emission is the main drawback of the coals, oil and gas.
The energy is our necessity to deal with our daily household activities; therefore, it should be cheap and easily accessible. Yet, a rich natural resource country can make the energy cheaply with these minerals, but she has to bear the cost of air and other pollutions. Moreover, these are not renewable and can be used for once. For example, if these resources are vanished from the earth, then our new generation cannot use it in the future, which will make this energy source more expensive.
On the other side of the picture, wind and solar are sustainable sources of the energy production and these are not harmful for the environment. Thus, these are useful for everyone. To get energy from air, solar and water dam, government or individual need to bear expense just for once, after that they can enjoy the fruit in their whole life. Moreover, these are renewable resources, but there is a problem that gust and solar setup can only be established at the suitable places.
To sum up the arguments, breeze and solar are suitable according to the weather conditions of the places, but these are more acceptable resources as compared to others, because these do not create the any type of pollution in the environment.
The
energy
, which
is produced
by wind and
solar
, is more beneficial and less harmful as compare to the power, which
is produced
by coal, oil and gas. There are several reasons to proof that, this is
positive
development
rather
than
negative
development.
For example
, carbon emission is the main drawback of the coals, oil and gas.
The
energy
is our necessity to deal with our daily household activities;
therefore
, it should be
cheap
and
easily
accessible.
Yet
, a rich natural
resource
country can
make
the
energy
cheaply
with these minerals,
but
she
has to
bear the cost of air and other pollutions.
Moreover
, these are not renewable and can be
used
for once.
For example
, if these resources
are vanished
from the earth, then our new generation cannot
use
it in the future, which will
make
this
energy
source more expensive.
On the other side of the picture, wind and
solar
are sustainable sources of the
energy
production and these are not harmful for the environment.
Thus
, these are useful for everyone. To
get
energy
from air,
solar
and water dam,
government
or individual need to bear expense
just
for once, after that they can enjoy the fruit in their whole life.
Moreover
, these are renewable resources,
but
there is a problem that gust and
solar
setup can
only
be established
at the suitable places.
To sum up the arguments, breeze and
solar
are suitable according to the weather conditions of the places,
but
these are more acceptable resources as compared to others,
because
these do not create the any type of pollution in the environment.