The life imprisonment is the most effective method of punishment than capital punishment. In my opinion, I agree with this statement because of the financial, the possible safety reasons and the appeal.
The costs involving life imprisonment are cheaper than capital punishment. The costs of carrying out a death sentence is more than the life imprisonment, because criminals are carrying out endless appeals to delay the procedures and takes up a lot of times. In California, for instance, spent more than $117 million each year to maintain and procedure of a death penalty compared to $2. 34 million for life in sentences. Therefore, life sentences are better than the death penalty for the cost effective reasons.
Moreover life sentences are the best approaches for providing safety to the public. Life without the possibility of parole is an alternative to capital punishment that addresses our need for public safety. Almost 9 out of 10 responses that life in prison without parole feels secure than that of capital punishment. Hence, by putting criminals in prison can provide some safe measure for public.
In my opinion, despite all those reasons, the most beneficial point for life in prison is the possible appeals. For example, the prisoner had locked up in cells for murdering 7 years old girl in 2000 in California. He was finally able to release from the cells with innocent guilty of murder cases after 16 years of persistent appeals. If he had sentenced for death penalty, the society would commit a crime of killing an innocent man. Therefore, life imprisonment is the best approach to provide the second chance for murderers.
In conclusion, the death penalty can be seen as the violation of criminal act of killing a person and possibility of killing an innocent person. Therefore, life imprisonment is the better punishment for murderers for its cost effective and public safety reasons.
The
life
imprisonment
is the most effective method of
punishment
than
capital
punishment
. In my opinion, I
agree
with this statement
because
of the financial, the possible
safety
reasons and the appeal.
The
costs
involving
life
imprisonment
are cheaper than
capital
punishment
. The
costs
of carrying out a death
sentence
is more than the
life
imprisonment
,
because
criminals are carrying out endless appeals to delay the procedures and takes up
a lot of
times. In California,
for instance
, spent more than $117 million each year to maintain and procedure of a death
penalty
compared to $2. 34 million for
life
in
sentences
.
Therefore
,
life
sentences
are better than the death
penalty
for the
cost
effective reasons.
Moreover
life
sentences
are the best approaches for providing
safety
to the public.
Life
without the possibility of parole is an alternative to
capital
punishment
that addresses our need for public
safety
. Almost 9 out of 10 responses that
life
in prison without parole feels
secure
than that of
capital
punishment
.
Hence
, by putting criminals in prison can provide
some
safe measure for public.
In my opinion, despite all those reasons, the most beneficial point for
life
in prison is the possible appeals.
For example
, the prisoner had locked up in cells for murdering 7 years
old
girl in 2000 in California. He was
finally
able to release from the cells with innocent guilty of murder cases after 16 years of persistent appeals. If he had sentenced for death
penalty
, the society would commit a crime of killing an innocent
man
.
Therefore
,
life
imprisonment
is the best approach to provide the second chance for murderers.
In conclusion
, the death
penalty
can be
seen
as the violation of criminal act of killing a person and possibility of killing an innocent person.
Therefore
,
life
imprisonment
is the better
punishment
for murderers for its
cost
effective and public
safety
reasons.