Some religious extremists deny serving the philosophy-opposed people, whereas the radical people believe everyone should receive treatment equally. Although people have the liberty of religious expression, the others also have rights to receive the identical services. Neither of someone’s rights are superior than the others.
The religious liberty which is one of the basic rights of each human should be expressed freely. Everyone owns rights to choose the philosophy to believe equally without any intervention and judgements. Therefore, people are manifestly accepted to behave based on their religious principles as long as these behaviors do not violate the law. Ultimately, if someone tries to prevent people from pursuing their justifiably religious desire, it will violate the personal freedom and the human rights.
In contrast, the others also own the rights to receive the appropriate treatment as equal as the religious-freed people, and these rights may generate a better scenario for the whole economy. As any rights, the rights to be served equally on everyone is reasonable. Additionally, the discrimination among customer segments may make the people or firms face to public protests so that these entities afterward will be isolated out of society gradually. Consequently, profit of these companies which is essential for surviving will end up with the catastrophic sliding. More companies are turned on by its customers, more detrimental effect economy will suffer.
Generally, the religious liberty and the equal-served rights have to be treated respectfully and identically. People will be selfish, if they concentrate on their religious freedom and ignore the interest of the others. Moreover, the religious extremists should also contemplate the costs that they may receive between discrimination and equality in the treatment towards the others.
Some
religious
extremists deny serving the philosophy-opposed
people
, whereas the radical
people
believe everyone should
receive
treatment
equally
. Although
people
have the liberty of
religious
expression, the others
also
have
rights
to
receive
the identical services. Neither of someone’s
rights
are
superior than
the others.
The
religious
liberty which is one of the basic
rights
of each human should
be expressed
freely
. Everyone
owns
rights
to choose the philosophy to believe
equally
without any intervention and judgements.
Therefore
,
people
are
manifestly
accepted
to behave based on their
religious
principles as long as these behaviors do not violate the law.
Ultimately
, if someone tries to
prevent
people
from pursuing their
justifiably
religious
desire, it will violate the personal freedom and the human rights.
In contrast
, the others
also
own
the
rights
to
receive
the appropriate treatment as equal as the religious-freed
people
, and these
rights
may generate a better scenario for the whole economy. As any
rights
, the
rights
to
be served
equally
on everyone is reasonable.
Additionally
, the discrimination among customer segments may
make
the
people
or firms face to public protests
so
that these entities afterward will
be isolated
out of society
gradually
.
Consequently
, profit of these
companies
which is essential for surviving will
end
up with the catastrophic sliding. More
companies
are turned
on by its customers, more detrimental effect economy will suffer.
Generally
, the
religious
liberty and the equal-served
rights
have to
be treated
respectfully
and
identically
.
People
will be selfish, if they concentrate on their
religious
freedom and
ignore
the interest of the others.
Moreover
, the
religious
extremists should
also
contemplate the costs that they may
receive
between discrimination and equality in the treatment towards the others.