In today's world, population composition plays a crucial role in deciding the future of a country. While some countries have a large proportion of teenagers, others have a comparatively huge chunk of older peoples, in their countries. However, are young adults more preferred for a country's economy, increased GDP and prosperity is a question to be answered.
It has been viewed that the countries with a large number of young adults, like India, where almost 30% population is comprised of youth, have a stronger, vital and focused workforce who aim to innovate and reinvent. These juveniles tend to have fresh ideas that could be implemented to improve GDP (Gross Domestic Product) of the country thereby increasing economic and financial output. However, having such a population comes with its own drawbacks. Juvenile delinquencies have become a common sight in these nations. Apart from that, these young peoples must be provided with more resources and need to be nurtured and cared for well. This may burn a hole in the government's pocket.
In other states; to illustrate - Japan, which has 50% population between the age of 50-60 years, have their own pros and cons. In such nations, citizens may have more experience and tend to be responsible in paying taxes. Also, traditions may be greatly respected. However, there are a number of pitfalls too. The number of juveniles has come down. Therefore, they do not have a secure future generation. Furthermore, these elderly people may need to be looked after in the near future. Countries like Japan are promoting couples to have children to tackle with this issue.
To summarize, although having an adolescent population has its own drawbacks, it is a far more sustainable option which is better in the long run. The advantages of this situation largely outweigh the disadvantages.
In
today
's world,
population
composition plays a crucial role in deciding the future of a
country
. While
some
countries
have a large proportion of
teenagers
, others have a
comparatively
huge chunk of older peoples, in their
countries
.
However
, are young adults more preferred for a country's economy, increased GDP and prosperity is a question to
be answered
.
It has
been viewed
that the
countries
with
a large number of
young adults, like India, where almost 30%
population
is comprised of
youth, have a stronger, vital and focused workforce who aim to innovate and reinvent. These juveniles tend to have fresh
ideas
that could
be implemented
to
improve
GDP (Gross Domestic Product) of the
country
thereby increasing economic and financial output.
However
, having such a
population
comes
with its
own
drawbacks. Juvenile delinquencies have become a common sight in these nations. Apart from that, these young peoples
must
be provided
with more resources and need to
be nurtured
and cared for well. This may burn a hole in the
government
's pocket.
In other states; to illustrate
-
Japan, which has 50%
population
between the age of 50-60 years, have their
own
pros and cons. In such nations, citizens may have more experience and tend to be responsible in paying taxes.
Also
, traditions may be
greatly
respected.
However
, there are a number of pitfalls too. The number of juveniles has
come
down.
Therefore
, they do not have a secure future generation.
Furthermore
, these elderly
people
may need to
be looked
after in the near future.
Countries
like Japan are promoting couples to have children to tackle with this issue.
To summarize
, although having an adolescent
population
has its
own
drawbacks, it is a far more sustainable option which is better in the long run. The advantages of this situation
largely
outweigh the disadvantages.