The reading excerpt states that there are three competing theories about how the great house which is massive stone buildings in New Mexico were used, the author provides three reasons for support these uses. However, the lecture' s audio claims that there are a lot of problems with the author' s theories and he refutes each of them by stating the cause of these uses is not obvious.
First, the article avers that the Chaco structures were purely residential because they were similar to the large, well-known apartment buildings at Taos. In contrast, the professor opposes this idea by saying that this is right only from the outside of the houses, but, from the inside, this leads to doubt because if hundreds of people lived there, so, there should be many fireplaces to be used for cooking. However, there were only a few of them for about only ten families but the rooms were for more than one hundreds persons. So, this idea of using these building for the living is not accurate and not credited to what the professor discussed.
Second, the passage posits that Chaco structures used to store food such as maize and protected them from spoiling. In contrary, the lecturer argues this point by stating that this idea does not support by pieces of evidence because if these large rooms were used for storage, thus, there should be some traces of the remains of maizes or their containers. Thus, this point of view contradicts what the professor explained.
Third, the excerpt mentions that these houses were used for special ceremonies because there are many pieces of evidence that there was large number of broken pots in which meals been prepared or served. On the other hand, the speaker counters this theory and explains that in addition to the pots remaining, there were other construction materials such as sands and stones, so, these houses might be a trash for construction materials, moreover, the remaining of the pots might be used by the construction workers. Thus, this outlook is definitely wrong.
The reading excerpt states that there are three competing theories about how the great
house
which is massive stone buildings in New Mexico were
used
, the author provides three reasons for support these
uses
.
However
, the
lecture&
#039; s audio claims that there are
a lot of
problems with the
author&
#039; s
theories and
he refutes each of them by stating the cause of these
uses
is not obvious.
First
, the article avers that the
Chaco
structures were
purely
residential
because
they were similar to the large, well-known apartment buildings at
Taos
.
In contrast
, the professor opposes this
idea
by saying that this is right
only
from the outside of the
houses
,
but
, from the inside, this leads to doubt
because
if hundreds of
people
lived
there,
so
, there should be
many
fireplaces to be
used
for cooking.
However
, there were
only
a few of them for about
only
ten families
but
the rooms were for more than
one hundreds
persons.
So
, this
idea
of using these building for the living is not accurate and not credited to what the professor discussed.
Second, the passage posits that
Chaco
structures
used
to store food such as maize and protected them from spoiling. In contrary, the lecturer argues this point by stating that this
idea
does not support by pieces of evidence
because
if these large rooms were
used
for storage,
thus
, there should be
some
traces of the remains of maizes or their containers.
Thus
, this point of view contradicts what the professor
explained
.
Third, the excerpt mentions that these
houses
were
used
for special ceremonies
because
there are
many
pieces of evidence that there was large number of broken pots in which meals
been prepared
or served.
On the other hand
, the speaker counters this theory and
explains
that
in addition
to the pots remaining, there were other construction materials such as sands and stones,
so
, these
houses
might be a trash for construction materials,
moreover
, the remaining of the pots might be
used
by the construction workers.
Thus
, this outlook is definitely
wrong
.