It is true that the artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly prevalent having a significant impact on all spheres of human life, especially educational environment, leading to in the fact that the position of educators could be substituted swiftly. It seems to me that I absolutely disagree with the idea.
There is an undeniable fact that the technology probably plays a crucial part in modern classrooms due to various reasons. Firstly, it is likely to be a window of opportunity allowing students to handily access the source of enormous knowledge from diverse domains, via social media, apps, websites. As a result, they may catch up with the latest information keeping pace with the global tendency. Secondly, advances in computers might definitely empower the study hours to be more appealing. This means that through lively videos, colourful images, it could afford to increase learner's concentration assisting the comprehension of lessons in being more effective.
Nevertheless, conventional teachers obviously have an indispensable role. The greatest important cause is that educators can provide children with the best way to master a variety of vital soft skills such as: communication skill, emotional skill, problem-solving skill, which are considered as a pivotal aspect contributing to their laying of the foundation for their career path. By contrast, this is impossible done by robots. Furthermore, It appears that each individual is radically different from others. Therefore, Teachers are able to identify their characteristics like: intellectual capabilities or feeling in order to flexibly select appropriate methods, inspiring them to absorb the lectures better, while computers are programmed in advance for objects equally.
In conclusion, Robots are a mere mechanism which never enable to take the place of traditional teacher in schools, but it may be a capable assistant bringing about the enhancement of educational quality.
It is true that the artificial intelligence is becoming
increasingly
prevalent having a significant impact on all spheres of human life,
especially
educational environment, leading to in the fact that the position of educators could
be substituted
swiftly
. It seems to me that I
absolutely
disagree with the
idea
.
There is an undeniable fact that the technology
probably
plays a crucial part in modern classrooms due to various reasons.
Firstly
, it is likely to be a window of opportunity allowing students to
handily
access the source of enormous knowledge from diverse domains, via social media, apps, websites.
As a result
, they may catch up with the latest information keeping pace with the global tendency.
Secondly
, advances in computers might definitely empower the study hours to be more appealing. This means that through lively videos,
colourful
images, it could afford to increase learner's concentration assisting the comprehension of lessons in being more effective.
Nevertheless
, conventional teachers
obviously
have an indispensable role. The greatest
important
cause is that educators can provide children with the best way to master a variety of vital soft
skills
such as: communication
skill
, emotional
skill
, problem-solving
skill
, which
are considered
as a pivotal aspect contributing to their laying of the foundation for their career path. By contrast, this is impossible done by robots.
Furthermore
, It appears that each individual is
radically
different
from others.
Therefore
, Teachers are able to identify their characteristics like: intellectual capabilities or feeling in order to
flexibly
select appropriate methods, inspiring them to absorb the lectures better, while computers
are programmed
in advance for objects
equally
.
In conclusion
, Robots are a mere mechanism which never enable to take the place of traditional teacher in schools,
but
it may be a capable assistant bringing about the enhancement of educational quality.