As documented in researches, as the population grows, the roads are becoming more crowded by cars. Thus, some people claim that municipalities must offer a way to convince people to tend to use public transit instead of private vehicles, which is costly. I personally believe that the best attempt that cities can do is to increase the tax paying rate on citizens the reasons for which will be demonstrated in the following essay.
No need to say, people have always reacted positively to taxes and became disciplined in any areas. To put in simple, before tax-paying method, people used to buy fuels, cloths and other things much more than they needed, but after the governments imposed the taxes on many aspects of life, individuals became less affordable to buy everything in any amount they wanted, and consequently tended to purchase whatever they really needed. To relate this to people’s transportation, when the government imposes more money in crowded roads on private-owned cars, citizens would tend to use buses, trains, and metros rather than automobiles. For example, last year the government of Islamic Iran raised the price of fuels for cars, and after several months you could realize how much the traffic had become lighter and the public conveyances more crowded. On the other hands, local authorities also can make people more aware of this phenomena, using the local public transport and not the cars, by raising taxes.
Indeed, in order to lead people into crowd transit, governments can fund on providing awareness campaigns using the money which has been accumulated from citizen’s taxes. As a matter of explanation, everybody needs to know that why and how they want to use for example subways; it would not be done until some social networks make people convinced that subways are not only less tax-free but also more affordable, convenient, environmentally responsible, and importantly safer. More precisely, after imposing more money on riding car in the streets and highways, still some people would tend to use their own vehicle because they think they have more money, cars are more convenient, and public means of transit are not suitable for them. Therefore, special campaigns can result in awareness of those people about advantages of using group transportation.
To sum up, by raising levy on automobiles, governments of cities can kill two birds with one stone; they will not only attract people' s attention into community transport but also make people more disciplined and aware about mass services using people’s own money for their own self financially.
As documented in researches, as the population grows, the roads are becoming more crowded by
cars
.
Thus
,
some
people
claim that municipalities
must
offer a way to convince
people
to tend to
use
public
transit
instead
of private vehicles, which is costly. I
personally
believe that the best attempt that cities can do is to increase the
tax
paying rate on citizens the reasons for which will
be demonstrated
in the following essay.
No need to say,
people
have always reacted
positively
to
taxes
and became disciplined in any areas. To put in simple,
before
tax-paying method,
people
used
to
buy
fuels, cloths and other things much more than they needed,
but
after the
governments
imposed the
taxes
on
many
aspects of life, individuals became less affordable to
buy
everything in any amount they wanted, and
consequently
tended to
purchase
whatever they
really
needed. To relate this to
people’s
transportation, when the
government
imposes more
money
in crowded roads on private-
owned
cars
, citizens would tend to
use
buses, trains, and metros
rather
than automobiles.
For example
, last year the
government
of Islamic Iran raised the price of fuels for
cars
, and after several months you could realize how much the traffic had become lighter and the
public
conveyances more crowded. On the other hands, local authorities
also
can
make
people
more aware of
this
phenomena, using the local
public
transport and not the
cars
, by raising taxes.
Indeed
, in order to lead
people
into crowd transit,
governments
can fund on providing awareness campaigns using the
money
which has
been accumulated
from citizen’s
taxes
. As a matter of explanation, everybody needs to know that why and how they want to
use
for example
subways; it would not
be done
until
some
social networks
make
people
convinced that subways are not
only
less tax-free
but
also
more affordable, convenient,
environmentally
responsible, and
importantly
safer. More
precisely
, after imposing more
money
on riding
car
in the streets and highways,
still
some
people
would tend to
use
their
own
vehicle
because
they
think
they have more
money
,
cars
are more convenient, and
public
means of transit are not suitable for them.
Therefore
, special campaigns can result in awareness of those
people
about advantages of using group transportation.
To sum up, by raising levy on automobiles,
governments
of cities can kill two birds with one stone; they will not
only
attract
people&
#039; s attention into community transport
but
also
make
people
more disciplined and aware about mass services using
people’s
own
money
for their
own
self
financially
.