There is no harm in saying that topic attracts the attention owing to its uniqueness and versatility. There are two dimensions, to be clearer, two factors of this approach. Due to incremental growth in population, one aspect it to utilize countryside for building houses, whereas, a different perspective is to accommodate people in existing cities and countryside beauty should not be harmed. Let’s discuss both school of thoughts before reaching to a final verdict.
To begin with, in running days, growing population is biggest concerning factor. It is evident that owing to drastic growth in population, it is quite difficult to adjust people in existing cities. Many countries around the world facing a lot of problem with accommodation. Prominent countries are US, India and Hong Kong, where people are forced to live in 60 or 45 square fit apartment. Consequently, living standards are compromised. There is an urgent need for city expansion and building new houses as population growth is not an interim issue that is going to be solved after sometime. In order to avoid fatal situations in future, it is essential to take proactive measures by building new houses and apartments not only in cities but also at countryside.
On the contrary, using countryside for building houses would certainly have negative impacts on scenic views and different tourist’s attraction. This would eventually result in less tourist’s visits and less revenue generation from this stream. Keeping these core drawbacks of expanding cities to countryside, in my opinion, Government should plan to build apartments and flats to accommodate people within cities. Instead of utilizing countryside, Government should pay attention to substitutes for population accommodation, such as allotting certain square foot for single houses. Encourage people for apartment living styles.
To recapitulate the aforementioned argument, there is no denial that population growth and accommodation concerns related to this is an inevitable issue and it should be dealt with proper house planning of Government and masses. Using country side to resolve this issue is not appropriate and long lasting solution. Preventive measures should also be taken for population growth in first place.
There is no harm in saying that topic attracts the attention owing to its uniqueness and versatility. There are two dimensions, to be clearer, two factors of this approach. Due to incremental
growth
in
population
, one aspect it to utilize
countryside
for
building
houses
, whereas, a
different
perspective is to accommodate
people
in existing
cities
and
countryside
beauty should not
be harmed
.
Let
’s discuss both school of thoughts
before
reaching to a final verdict.
To
begin
with, in running days, growing
population
is
biggest
concerning factor. It is evident that owing to drastic
growth
in
population
, it is quite difficult to adjust
people
in existing
cities
.
Many
countries around the world facing
a lot of problem
with accommodation. Prominent countries are US, India and Hong Kong, where
people
are forced
to
live
in 60 or 45 square fit
apartment
.
Consequently
, living standards
are compromised
. There is an urgent need for city expansion and
building
new
houses
as
population
growth
is not an interim issue
that is
going to
be solved
after sometime. In order to avoid fatal situations
in future
, it is essential to take proactive measures by
building
new
houses
and
apartments
not
only
in
cities
but
also
at countryside.
On the contrary
, using
countryside
for
building
houses
would
certainly
have
negative
impacts on scenic views and
different
tourist’s attraction. This would
eventually
result in less tourist’s visits and less revenue generation from this stream. Keeping these core drawbacks of expanding
cities
to
countryside
, in my opinion,
Government
should plan to build
apartments
and flats to accommodate
people
within
cities
.
Instead
of utilizing
countryside
,
Government
should pay attention to substitutes for
population
accommodation, such as allotting certain square foot for single
houses
. Encourage
people
for
apartment
living styles.
To recapitulate the aforementioned argument, there is no denial that
population
growth
and accommodation concerns related to this is an inevitable issue and it should
be dealt
with proper
house
planning of
Government
and masses. Using country side to resolve this issue is not appropriate and
long lasting
solution. Preventive measures should
also
be taken
for
population
growth
in
first
place.