It is believed by some that developed countries should provide humanitarian aid to underdeveloped countries during natural catastrophes. This essay strongly agrees with this assertion because richer countries alone have the resources to do so and it is a moral imperative.
Developed nations are financially prosperous, so they have the unique ability to immediately help others in crisis. As their economies are robust, they can provide the types of aid for countries in crisis that no one else can. This aid can come in many forms, whether it be emergency health care and provisions, or even various types of transport, which poorer nations are generally in shortage of. For example, following the monsoon floods in Bangladesh, many nations helped by providing temporary shelters, shipping untold amounts of food, and even loaning helicopters for the evacuation, none of which could have been adequately provided by poorer countries.
The second reason why rich nations should help less fortunate ones is that it is the right thing to do. From birth, we are all taught that we should love our fellow man and help each other when we are in need. Being rich does not exempt oneself from this moral imperative. Rather, it makes it essential, as if people cannot find it in themselves to share their ample resources with people suffering in other countries, their values will erode at home. For example, Barack Obama once said that if Americans could justify turning their backs on people who were suffering abroad, it would then become easier for Americans to start turning their backs on each other.
In conclusion, this essay affirms that wealthy countries should assist poorer ones in times of need because they have the resources to do so and it is the morally right thing to do.
It
is believed
by
some
that developed
countries
should provide humanitarian aid to underdeveloped
countries
during natural catastrophes. This essay
strongly
agrees
with this assertion
because
richer
countries
alone have the resources to do
so
and it is a moral imperative.
Developed
nations
are
financially
prosperous,
so
they have the unique ability to immediately
help
others in crisis. As their economies are robust, they can provide the types of aid for
countries
in crisis that no one else can. This aid can
come
in
many
forms, whether it be emergency health care and provisions, or even various types of transport, which poorer
nations
are
generally
in shortage of.
For example
, following the monsoon floods in Bangladesh,
many
nations
helped
by providing temporary shelters, shipping untold amounts of food, and even loaning helicopters for the evacuation, none of which could have been
adequately
provided by poorer countries.
The second reason why rich
nations
should
help
less fortunate
ones
is that it is the right thing to do. From birth, we are all taught that we should
love
our fellow
man
and
help
each other when we are in need. Being rich does not exempt oneself from this moral imperative.
Rather
, it
makes
it essential, as if
people
cannot find it in themselves to share their ample resources with
people
suffering in other
countries
, their values will erode at home.
For example
, Barack Obama once said that if Americans could justify turning their backs on
people
who were suffering abroad, it would then become easier for Americans to
start
turning their backs on each other.
In conclusion
, this essay affirms that wealthy
countries
should assist poorer
ones
in times of need
because
they have the resources to do
so
and it is the
morally
right thing to do.