It is argued that in some nations, the states give priority to economic growth as compared to the other concerns. While the main advantage of this approach is better living standards, I believe that it can affect health and education for the general public.
The primary advantage of prioritizing economic growth is that it can improve living standards and reduce the poverty rate. In other words, high average incomes enable consumers to enjoy more goods and services and a better lifestyle. This means that people will have more income that will eventually reduce the poverty rate. For example, a recent report published by BBC suggested that economic growth in the twentieth century was a major factor in reducing absolute levels of poverty and enabling a rise in life expectancy. Despite this, I think that the government should also take care of the health of people and provide them the best education services.
The major drawback of this approach is that it can affect health services and education facilities for the citizens of the country because they are not prioritized. That is to say that public services will not get adequate funds to spend on improving health care facilities and education services for the citizens. As a result, it will lower the literacy rate and people will encounter with diseases. For instance, according to a recent survey by the Guardian the countries like China that give more importance to economic growth, 35% of the people from these countries are suffering from serious health issues.
In conclusion, although prioritizing economic growth is beneficial because it increases the living standards and reduces the poverty rate, I believe that poor health facilities and education are a major drawback.
It
is argued
that in
some
nations, the states give priority to
economic
growth
as compared to the other concerns. While the main advantage of this approach is better living standards, I believe that it can affect
health
and
education
for the
general public
.
The primary advantage of prioritizing
economic
growth
is that it can
improve
living standards and
reduce
the
poverty
rate
.
In other words
, high average incomes enable consumers to enjoy more
goods
and
services
and a better lifestyle. This means that
people
will have more income that will
eventually
reduce
the
poverty
rate
.
For example
, a recent report published by BBC suggested that
economic
growth
in the twentieth century was a major factor in reducing absolute levels of
poverty
and enabling a rise in life expectancy. Despite this, I
think
that the
government
should
also
take care of the
health
of
people
and provide them the best
education
services.
The major drawback of this approach is that it can affect
health
services
and
education
facilities for the citizens of the country
because
they are not prioritized.
That is
to say that public
services
will not
get
adequate funds to spend on improving
health
care facilities and
education
services
for the citizens.
As a result
, it will lower the literacy
rate
and
people
will encounter with diseases.
For instance
, according to a recent survey by the Guardian the countries like China that give more importance to
economic
growth
, 35% of the
people
from these countries are suffering from serious
health
issues.
In conclusion
, although prioritizing
economic
growth
is beneficial
because
it increases the living standards and
reduces
the
poverty
rate
, I believe that poor
health
facilities and
education
are a major drawback.
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes