The animal right has been a controversial issue ever since the dawn of industrialisation. Some argue that animals deserve to be treated the same way as humans, while others contend that humans must employ animals to fulfil their numerous needs. Both points of views will be analysed in this essay before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.
On the one hand, fair treatment of animals appears to be the moral thing to do. For example, animal rights activists groups have repeatedly performed studies that demonstrate that animals, when subjected to macabre conditions of slaughterhouses and laboratories, feel the pain in the same manner as human beings. Since most humans would never support the idea of inflicting such pain on their fellow human beings, it is only fair that animals should also be spared from this torment. When looking at this side of the argument, it is obvious why some support this stance.
On the other hand, many people opine that animals should be exploited in order to fulfil a number of human needs including food and research activities. Take pharmaceutical industry, for example, if humans stop testing drugs on animals to ensure their safety for subsequent human use, fatal damage could be caused to human beings as a result of using unsafe medicines. As without such medicines, the life expectancy of humans can fall dramatically, it is understandable why this point of view has garnered support.
Although both sides of this argument have indisputable virtues, it is felt that animal exploitation should only be upheld for medical research purposes. It is hoped, that animal sufferings in the laboratories will be minimised in the future.
The
animal
right has been a controversial issue ever since the dawn of
industrialisation
.
Some
argue that
animals
deserve to
be treated
the same way as
humans
, while others contend that
humans
must
employ
animals
to fulfil their numerous needs. Both points of views will be
analysed
in this essay
before
a reasoned conclusion
is drawn
.
On the one hand,
fair
treatment of
animals
appears to be the moral thing to do.
For example
,
animal
rights activists groups have
repeatedly
performed studies that demonstrate that
animals
, when subjected to macabre conditions of slaughterhouses and laboratories, feel the pain in the same manner as
human
beings. Since most
humans
would never support the
idea
of inflicting such pain on their fellow
human
beings, it is
only
fair
that
animals
should
also
be spared
from this torment. When looking at this side of the argument, it is obvious why
some
support this stance.
On the other hand
,
many
people
opine that
animals
should
be exploited
in order to fulfil a number of
human
needs including food and research activities. Take pharmaceutical industry,
for example
, if
humans
stop
testing drugs on
animals
to ensure their safety for subsequent
human
use
, fatal damage could
be caused
to
human
beings
as a result
of using unsafe medicines. As without such medicines, the life expectancy of
humans
can fall
dramatically
, it is understandable why this point of view has garnered support.
Although both sides of this argument have indisputable virtues, it
is felt
that
animal
exploitation should
only
be upheld
for medical research purposes. It
is hoped
, that
animal
sufferings in the laboratories will be
minimised
in the future.
5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
21Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
3Mistakes