In recent times, a large amount of money is spent on local environmental problems with the purpose of improving the environment’s quality. However, some people believe that the authorities should pay more attention to much more urgent issues such as global warming. From my personal point of view, I side with the view that in spite of the needs of money on such indispensable issues, the government should also keep on increasing funding into local problems.
On the one hand, threatening issues do need more money and attention from the human beings. Global warming is one of the major cause of numerous natural catastrophes such as surging seas, tsunami, volcanic eruption, etc. The massive environmental carnage caused by humans behaviours directly leads to severe damages to the “green lungs” of our planet, which increase the amount of carbon dioxide or any types of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. As a result, this could be considered as one of the most urgent problems that humans need to confront in the 21st century, which can cost governments around the world a huge amount of money.
On the other hands, local environmental problems are also included in adverse changes of our ecosystem. Wastes, garbages are directly disposed to people’s surroundings without any appropriate treatments due to human daily activities such as eating, showering, . . . Moreover, pollution released from transportation, especially private vehicles also plays an essential part in contaminating the air atmosphere and immensely harmful to the our health. As a consequence, only when our natural ‘s system is protected can humans improve the quality of our environment. In order to make that vital change, the authorities should also spend more money on local issues.
In conclusion, despite the urgent needs of solving threatening environmental problems, I believe that we should also continue funding into local issues to gradually make progress in protecting the environment.
In recent times, a large amount of
money
is spent
on
local
environmental
problems
with the purpose of improving the environment’s quality.
However
,
some
people
believe that the authorities should pay more attention
to
much more urgent
issues
such as global warming. From my personal point of view, I side with the view that
in spite of
the
needs
of
money
on such indispensable
issues
, the
government
should
also
keep
on increasing funding into
local
problems.
On the one hand, threatening
issues
do
need
more
money
and attention from the
human
beings. Global warming is one of the major cause of numerous natural catastrophes such as surging seas, tsunami, volcanic eruption, etc. The massive
environmental
carnage caused by
humans
behaviours
directly
leads to severe damages to the “green lungs” of our planet, which increase the amount of carbon dioxide or any types of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
As a result
, this could
be considered
as one of the most urgent
problems
that
humans
need
to confront in the 21st century, which can cost
governments
around the world a huge amount of money.
On the other hands,
local
environmental
problems
are
also
included in adverse
changes
of our ecosystem. Wastes,
garbages
are
directly
disposed to
people
’s surroundings without any appropriate treatments due to
human
daily activities such as eating, showering
, .
.
.
Moreover
, pollution released from transportation,
especially
private vehicles
also
plays an essential part in contaminating the air atmosphere and
immensely
harmful to
the our health
. As a consequence,
only
when our natural ‘s system
is protected
can
humans
improve
the quality of our environment. In order to
make
that vital
change
, the authorities should
also
spend more
money
on
local
issues.
In conclusion
, despite the urgent
needs
of solving threatening
environmental
problems
, I believe that we should
also
continue funding into
local
issues
to
gradually
make
progress in protecting the environment.