Some people think that a country’s economic success is related to the amount of work done by its citizens each day, and therefore countries with longer working hours tend to have higher levels of productivity. However, although this may seem like a positive phenomenon, there are actually some serious drawbacks. This essay will argue that longer hours can be counterproductive.
To begin with, the claim that longer working hours equates to economic success is hard to substantiate. For one thing, the most economically developed countries in the world don’t necessarily have long working days than the less-developed nations. In fact, in recent decades Europe and North America have seen the average work day decrease in length along with a rise in output, while many poorer countries see their populations toil with little to show for their efforts. Thus, one could conclude that it is the quality of work and not quantity that is important.
The reason why some countries work long days and yet lower levels of economic productivity is most likely related to the negative social impact of these long hours. To maintain a strong economy, a country needs a healthy and happy population who are engaged in activities that generate commerce. However, if people working all day, they have less time to eat out at restaurants or go shopping. While it may seem trivial, these are important for the economy. Moreover, when people work too much, their health may suffer, along with their relationships. These too can cause a drain on the economy.
In conclusion, it is not always true that longer working hours correlate with economic success, and the reasons for this are varied. In fact, as demonstrated above, having a population work too much may actually do the opposite of what is intended.
Some
people
think
that a
country’s
economic
success
is related
to the amount of
work
done by its citizens each day, and
therefore
countries
with
longer
working
hours
tend to have higher levels of productivity.
However
, although this may seem like a
positive
phenomenon, there are actually
some
serious drawbacks. This essay will argue that
longer
hours
can be counterproductive.
To
begin
with, the claim that
longer
working
hours
equates to
economic
success is
hard
to substantiate. For one thing, the most
economically
developed
countries
in the world don’t
necessarily
have long
working
days than the less-developed nations. In fact, in recent decades Europe and North America have
seen
the average
work
day decrease in length along with a rise in output, while
many
poorer
countries
see
their populations toil with
little
to
show
for their efforts.
Thus
, one could conclude that it is the quality of
work
and not quantity
that is
important
.
The reason why
some
countries
work
long days and
yet
lower levels of
economic
productivity is most likely related to the
negative
social impact of these long
hours
. To maintain a strong economy, a
country
needs a healthy and happy population who
are engaged
in activities that generate commerce.
However
, if
people
working
all day, they have less time to eat out at restaurants or go shopping. While it may seem trivial, these are
important
for the economy.
Moreover
, when
people
work
too much, their health may suffer, along with their relationships. These too can cause a drain on the economy.
In conclusion
, it is not always true that
longer
working
hours
correlate with
economic
success, and the reasons for this
are varied
. In fact, as demonstrated above, having a population
work
too much may actually do the opposite of what
is intended
.