1 People think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to modern buildings. To what extent do you agree or disagree? v.1
1 People think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to modern buildings. v. 1
Some people believe that historical buildings must be demolished to make room for more modern structures, while others are against this notion. In my opinion, heritage buildings that contribute to the aesthetic, cultural, and functionality of the society must be preserved while buildings that do not fulfil these criteria can be knocked down.
To begin with, buildings with cultural value are important because of their characteristic value that contributes to the city image. For instance, the Empire state building in New York is nearly a century old, but the design and the height of the erection draws many tourists to the building. This inflow of the visitors generates revenue for the city and the structure has become a symbolic figure for the city. Thus, there are some historical buildings that have a bigger role in society which is why they should be protected.
On the other hand, some buildings must be knocked down because of costly maintenance. There are many buildings that are extremely old and built with low-quality materials, hence, it is a waste of resources to care for such places. For example, many ancient castles in Europe are falling apart because of the expensive preservation cost that owners cannot afford. In such cases, it is reasonable to destroy an ancient figure for a more modern sustainable building.
In conclusion, I believe many historical buildings play an important role in society due to their past and cultural significance. However, some architecture is too old, that alternative is to replace them with a newer development.
Some
people
believe that historical
buildings
must
be demolished
to
make
room for more modern structures, while others are against this notion. In my opinion, heritage
buildings
that contribute to the aesthetic, cultural, and functionality of the society
must
be preserved
while
buildings
that do not fulfil these criteria can
be knocked
down.
To
begin
with,
buildings
with cultural value are
important
because
of their characteristic value that contributes to the city image.
For instance
, the Empire state
building
in New York is
nearly
a century
old
,
but
the design and the height of the erection draws
many
tourists to the
building
. This inflow of the visitors generates revenue for the city and the structure has become a symbolic figure for the city.
Thus
, there are
some
historical
buildings
that have a bigger role in society which is why they should
be protected
.
On the other hand
,
some
buildings
must
be knocked
down
because
of costly maintenance. There are
many
buildings
that are
extremely
old
and built with low-quality materials,
hence
, it is a waste of resources to care for such places.
For example
,
many
ancient castles in Europe are falling apart
because
of the expensive preservation cost that owners cannot afford. In such cases, it is reasonable to
destroy
an ancient figure for a more modern sustainable building.
In conclusion
, I believe
many
historical
buildings
play an
important
role in society due to their past and cultural significance.
However
,
some
architecture is too
old
, that alternative is to replace them with a newer development.
9Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
9Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
9Mistakes